Supreme Court issues notice to CBI, Kerala in ice cream parlour case

Plea filed by V.S. to quash order declining CBI probe

November 22, 2013 01:32 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 10:13 pm IST - New Delhi

Former Kerala chief minister V.S. Achuthanandan. Photo: C. Ratheesh kumar

Former Kerala chief minister V.S. Achuthanandan. Photo: C. Ratheesh kumar

The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to the Kerala government, the CBI and others on a petition filed by former Chief Minister V.S. Achuthanandan seeking a CBI probe into the ice cream parlour sex scandal.

A Bench of Justices Ms. Ranjana Desai and C. Nagappan issued the notice after hearing senior counsel Shekar Naphade and counsel R. Sathish on a special leave petition against a Kerala High Court judgment rejecting his plea. The bench granted four weeks for filing the response.

Mr. Naphade said, “The High Court has tried to brush aside the allegations against high public functionaries under the carpet. This is the shocking state of affair, to say the least. I am afraid if this case does not warrant a CBI probe then which case will merit such kind of investigation. Even after lapse of a decade, the investigation has not proceeded to find out the truth. There is no investigation worth the name and attempts are made to shield the real culprits.”

Counsel drew the court’s attention to the inquiry report and said “they accept money has been exchanged, but say they don’t know the quantum of money.” He said “22 public officials are involved and if I reveal the names it will be embarrassing for the institution.”

According to Mr. Achuthanandan, P.K. Kunhalikutty and others had hatched a conspiracy and influenced the witnesses, created false evidence and forged documents to save Mr. Kunhalikutty from the case. He said that a Special Investigation Team was constituted by the LDF government. After the new government came to power, Mr. Kunhalikutty went on to become the Industries Minister. Since then, there had been no progress in the investigation into the case. This was because of the power wielded by the Minister, he alleged.

He said “the question is: Whether the alleged involvement of important functionaries of the State and judiciary by itself even if it is true as observed by the High Court is not a consideration to justify an investigation by the CBI.” In the present case, he said “it is not the involvement alone but a categorical finding of fraud being perpetrated to scuttle investigation and trial and yet, the local investigating team was unwilling to go further to unearth truth.

Mr. Achuthanandan sought quashing of the August 30 order of the High Court declining CBI probe.

Meanwhile, a bench of Justices K.S. Radhakrishnan and A.K. Sikri dismissed a special leave petition filed by N.K. Abdul Azeez against a High Court judgment rejecting CBI probe in a similar matter.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.