State defends Vizhinjam project

Three-member panel appointed to look into CAG report, HC told

September 26, 2017 08:59 pm | Updated 08:59 pm IST - KOCHI

The State government is of the view that the activities of the Vizhinjam International Seaport Project cannot be “arbitrarily brought to an end considering the socio-economic benefits to be derived out of the project.”

The views of the government were made known before the High Court in an affidavit filed by P.T. Joy, the Under Secretary to the government, Fisheries and Ports Department, in a case filed by M.K. Salim of Kollam seeking a CBI probe into the agreement entered into between the State government and M/s Adani Ports and Special Economic Zones Limited for the implementation of the project. The petitioner had also highlighted the conclusions of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG).

The State government submitted that it had appointed a three-member commission to look into the reports of the CAG into the implementation of the Vizhinjam International Multipurpose Deepwater Seaport project. The government has also taken serious view of the CAG report and has requested the three-member panel to look into the report, the Sate submitted before the High Court.

Meanwhile, former Chief Minister Oommen Chandy, in his affidavit stated that though the State government led by the LDF had decided and declared to proceed with the project, it may not be “presenting the actual affairs which culminated in the award of the project” before the High Court “due to political overtones.”

He submitted that “unless and until all the relevant materials are placed before the court, the court may be prevented from arriving at a just conclusion.”

The former Chief Minister said the present LDF Ministry “may not be interested in presenting the correct statement of facts before the court, since they want to take advantage of the situation created by the report of the CAG, which was actually framed not on correct set of facts and figures.”

Mr. Chandy submitted that the “CAG report is itself flawed in as much as the observations therein are solely on the basis of the report of the Principal Accountant General (PAG). The PAG report was prepared in total non-compliance of the audit guidelines and bad for serious procedural lapses and impropriety occurred in the audit process,” he submitted.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.