RTI reply misread, says govt.

Release of those convicted for highly sensational and emotive crimes

March 24, 2017 06:09 pm | Updated November 11, 2017 12:18 pm IST - Thiruvananthapuram

The State government on Thursday scrambled to deny the politically damaging allegation that it had “brazenly” recommended the “release” of “notorious law breakers” convicted of grave crimes.

Television news channels raked up the issue by airing a Right to Information (RTI) reply from the Prisons Department which stated that jail inmates approved for “remission” included those convicted for highly sensational and emotive crimes.

The RTI reply listed CPI(M) men serving life-term for the murder of T.P. Chandrasekharan among those eligible for “cancellation of penalty.” The list also included the names of millionaire Nizam convicted of running down a security guard with his expensive car and “gang leader” Om Prakash serving time for murder. The RTI query was specific about the names of convicts.

At least three Malayalam channels aired the controversial RTI reply simultaneously in the morning and capped the “breaking news” with live political debates. Opposition leaders said on TV that they would raise the “impending release” of prisoners as an election issue.

‘Grossly misread’

Director General of Prisons R. Sreelekha told The Hindu that the RTI reply had been grossly misread. Some quarters had misinterpreted it as early release of convicts.

In fact, prisoners could earn a few days remission of their sentence if they conducted themselves properly, obeyed jail rules, and worked productively. “For instance, a convict serving a three-month term can be given a maximum remission of 15 days,” she said.

It was the prerogative of the jail superintendent concerned to make the recommendation. The Prisons Department would send it to the Home Department for further approval after a preliminary vetting. Remission of sentence should not be equated with outright release of the convict, she said.

Home Department officials said the list of those serving time for grave crimes had been struck of the list of those eligible for reduction of sentence time. They said there was no wrongdoing on the part of the Prisons Department in this regard. The list has been sent to the Governor for approval.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.