Probe against VS, Pinarayi

Hiring lawyers from outside to represent the State in cases

July 12, 2013 01:14 am | Updated November 16, 2021 09:44 pm IST - Thiruvananthapuram:

V.S. Achuthanandan and Pinarayi Vijayan

V.S. Achuthanandan and Pinarayi Vijayan

An anti-corruption court here on Monday ordered the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) to “conduct a preliminary inquiry” into the allegation that former Chief Minister V.S. Achuthanandan had caused a loss of Rs.3 crore to the exchequer by hiring lawyers from outside to represent the State in various cases in the Supreme Court during 2006-08.

John K. Illikadan, Vigilance Inquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, passed the order on the basis of a petition filed by Raju Puzhankara, social activist.

Former Home Minister Kodiyeri Balakrishnan, former Law Minister M. Vijayakumar, and Communist Party of India (Marxist) State secretary Pinarayi Vijayan were the other respondents in the case.

In his petition, Mr. Puzhankara alleged that Mr. Achuthanandan had sought the service of private law practitioners when the State government had “enough number of government pleaders” to represent it in the apex court. For one, the Left Democratic Front (LDF) government had spent Rs.15 lakh from the treasury just to procure legal opinion in the ice-cream parlour sex-scandal case.

The petitioner said the State government had given Rs.5 lakh from the treasury to argue in court that a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) inquiry was not necessary in the SNC-Lavalin corruption case in which Mr. Vijayan was an accused. He alleged that the State had caused wrongful loss to the taxpayer by seeking to save its “political member from a CBI inquiry using public money.”

He said the LDF government had bypassed State lawyers and gave its brief to private law practitioners in the Merchiston Estate land-grab case, the lottery case against Santiago Martin, the Kovalam Palace case, the self-financing colleges case, the Athirappilly hydropower project case and the palm oil case. The court ordered the VACB to file its report on or before October 20, 2013.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.