No ban on slaughterof cattle for meat: HC

Dismisses writ petition challenging validity of the rules

May 31, 2017 07:10 pm | Updated 07:10 pm IST - KOCHI

Observing that there was absolutely no ban on slaughtering of cattle under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Regulations of Livestock Markets) Rules, 2017 notified by the Centre, a Division Bench of the Kerala High Court on Wednesday dismissed as withdrawn a public interest writ petition challenging the validity of the rules.

When the petition came up for hearing, the Bench headed by Chief Justice Navniti Prasad Singh orally observed that the rules did not ban slaughtering of cattle. It only prohibited the sale of cattle at animal markets. The rules “don’t go beyond that.” There was no restriction on selling cattle from home or other places. The Bench added that one could sell and slaughter cattle and eat their meat.

When counsel for the petitioner pointed out that Article 21 (right to life) of the Constitution was affected by the rules, the court asked him “who is stopping you from selling beef.” There was ‘nothing’ in the notification which banned the sale of beef.

The court orally observed that the people were becoming tense because they had not chosen to read the rules. The court said that the petitioner did not seem to want the people to read the rules. “If you are a public spirited persons, take the rules to the people,” the court said.

When the petitioner T.G. Sunil, State general secretary of the Youth Congress, submitted that order was an infringement on the right to food, the Bench asked how the right to eat was affected by restricting the sale of cattle. The Bench also reminded the petitioner that a total ban on cow slaughter had been upheld by the Supreme Court.

The court also expressed its surprise over the Madras High Court verdict staying the rules. Faced with the oral observation of the Bench, counsel for the petitioner withdrew the petition with the permission of the court.

The petitioner contended that as the preservation, protection of animals, prevention of animal diseases, and veterinary training and practice came under the State list, only the State had the power to make any regulations on cattle. The Centre had encroached on the power of the State government. The new rules issued under the Act, therefore, had no nexus whatsoever with the objects sought to be achieved by the PCA Act, the petitioner contended.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.