SC fines Kerala govt. for 'frivolous plea'

Issues notice to the Chief Secretary for not issuing the official orders re-appointing Senkumar to the top post of the police force.

May 05, 2017 11:37 am | Updated 10:18 pm IST - New Delhi

A view of the Supreme Court of India.

A view of the Supreme Court of India.

The Supreme Court on Friday slapped ₹25,000 costs on the Pinarayi Vijayan-led Kerala government for seeking modification of the court’s judgment reinstating T.P. Senkumar as Kerala police chief.

In its clarification, the State took the plea that Mr. Senkumar was never appointed the ‘State Police Chief’ and was only designated as the ‘Head of Police Force’.

“This is in extremely bad taste. You never made these arguments before in this court and now you have come with this?” a Bench led by Justice Madan B. Lokur asked Kerala counsel.

When the government attempted to withdraw the application to save itself from costs, the Bench said it would still have to pay the costs even after withdrawing.

‘Mala fide intentions’

Making matters worse for the State, the court observed that it was now left with no doubt whatsoever that the removal of Mr. Senkumar was done with “mala fide intentions”.

The State had submitted that the ‘State Police Chief’ was a distinct and separate post under Section 18 of the Kerala Police Act of 2011. Mr. Senkumar was appointed on May 22, 2015 as ‘Director General of Police and Head of Police Force’.

The Bench, however, issued notice on a separate contempt of court petition filed by Mr. Senkumar, through his counsel Haris Beeran, against the State’s Chief Secretary, Nalini Netto, for not issuing the official orders re-appointing him to the helm of the police force. Mr. Senkumar termed Ms. Netto’s alleged reluctance to issue orders to reinstate him “wilful and deliberate disobedience” of the SC.

He said Ms. Netto was the “primary component,” which led to his ouster on June 1, 2016. Ms. Netto had “created” the reasons for his removal, and now wanted to circumvent or at least delay his reinstatement, he alleged.

The SC, in a detailed judgment on April 24, 2017, had found the Kerala government’s decision to remove him on the ground of poor performance as DGP — especially in the aftermath of the Puttingal temple fire tragedy and the Jisha murder case — to be arbitrary, unsubstantiated and unfair. The judgment served a blow to the Vijayan government.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.