Binoy issue: Opposition stages walkout

Anil Akkara accuses government of committing lapses in probing cases

February 06, 2018 09:13 pm | Updated 09:13 pm IST - THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Members of the Opposition kept the case against CPI(M) State secretary Kodiyeri Balakrishnan’s son Binoy Kodiyeri alive by seeking a discussion in the Assembly on Tuesday.

Anil Akkara, who gave notice for an adjournment motion, said the wrongdoings of Mr. Balakrishnan and his relatives and two prominent MLAs of the ruling party within and outside the country had affected the credibility of Non-Resident Keralites (NoRKs) and the future of the Loka Kerala Sabha.

He accused the government of committing serious lapses in probing the cases and covering up the issue.

Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan said the government was not linked to the issue in any manner and Mr. Balakrishnan and the CPI(M) had clarified that neither he nor the party had any involvement in it.

The issue was being tossed up to undermine the Loka Kerala Sabha by dragging it into a controversy.

Wards of many political leaders were NoRKs and some of them were businessmen. They involved in financial transactions and issued cheques. Binoy too had made such transactions, but such issues were settled among the business partners.

The government and the Assembly had no role in such issues.

Parliamentary space was never used to discuss cases involving the relatives of political leaders that were discussed by the media.

Cases against Karthik Chidambaram, Robert Vadra, and Jay Shah were never discussed in Parliament.

The notice was politically motivated and smacked of a conspiracy, he said.

Clarification

E.P. Jayarajan then clarified that his son had helped a NoRK businessman’s son-in-law and had not defrauded anyone.

Leader of the Opposition Ramesh Chennithala said the issue was not flagged by the Opposition but by CPI(M) general secretary Sitaram Yechury.

Earlier, Speaker P. Sreeramakrishnan said rules did not permit the discussion of an issue on the basis of news reports, but he was granting permission to give notice considering it as a privilege of the Opposition.

Based on the government explanation, Mr. Sreeramakrishnan denied leave for the motion and the Opposition walked out in protest.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.