Athirappilly project is undesirable, says Madhav Gadgil

Says there is not enough water to generate the power claimed

December 16, 2012 03:07 am | Updated November 12, 2016 05:39 am IST - Thiruvananthapuram

Supreme Court judge A.K. Patnaik (extreme right) looks on as Madhav Gadgil, chairman of the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (extreme left) arrives on stage at the inaugural function of the International law conference on ‘Conservation of Forests, Wildlife and Ecology’ in Thiruvananthapuram on Saturday. Also seated are Glen Barry of the U.S. (left) and V.K. Biju, lawyer, Supreme Court. Photo: S. Gopakumar

Supreme Court judge A.K. Patnaik (extreme right) looks on as Madhav Gadgil, chairman of the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (extreme left) arrives on stage at the inaugural function of the International law conference on ‘Conservation of Forests, Wildlife and Ecology’ in Thiruvananthapuram on Saturday. Also seated are Glen Barry of the U.S. (left) and V.K. Biju, lawyer, Supreme Court. Photo: S. Gopakumar

Chairman of the Western Ghats Ecology Expert Panel (WGEEP) Madhav Gadgil said in Thiruvananthapuram on Saturday that the Athirappilly hydel project was undesirable, not just on environmental, but on technical and economic grounds also.

During an interaction with the media on the sidelines of an international conference on Conservation of Forests, Wildlife and Ecology, he said the WGEEP report had termed the project undesirable on the basis of inputs provided by the River Research Foundation.

“They found that there is not enough water to generate the power claimed. This naturally pushes up the cost of generation. The foundation also revealed that the project would affect downstream irrigation schemes and waterfalls impacting on the tourism potential of the area. Besides, it will destroy one of the last low elevation riverine forests”.

Forest Rights Act

Prof. Gadgil said the project would also violate the Forest Rights Act. “Yet there is a clamour that Kerala needs it”. He said WGEEP had held a meeting with representatives from the River Research Foundation and the government before finalising the observations on the project.

“The government engineers who were present raised no objections. Hence, we came to the conclusion that there is no justifiable case for a dam”.

Asked for his opinion on the options for a power-starved State like Kerala, he said the solution lay in demand side management.

“We are only thinking of generating more power while there is an urgent need to curb wastage and switch over to energy efficient methods”.

Prof. Gadgil said the panel’s recommendation to decommission dams that had outlived their age was open to discussion.

“It is a proposal that can be reversed if convincing arguments can be brought up through a democratic debate”.

He said the southern regions of the Western Ghats including Kerala were richer in biodiversity and better conserved than northern regions such as Maharashtra and Gujarat.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.