Reddy says VACB reportdoes not reflect his version

January 15, 2017 08:53 pm | Updated January 16, 2017 08:36 am IST - Thiruvananthapuram:

Director General of Police N. Sankar Reddy has said that the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) which he formerly headed has been grossly unfair to him of late.

The ranking officer, who spoke at length to The Hindu on Sunday, said he felt short-changed that his version of events was not reflected in the preliminary inquiry report (PER) filed by the VACB in connection with the accusation that Mr. Reddy as director and R. Sukeshan, SP, as Investigating Officer (IO), had connived to derail the bar licence renewal bribery case against former Finance Minister K.M. Mani.

(The VACB has given both a clean chit in the case.)

The PER, which was made public on Friday, just stated that Mr. Reddy’s 71-page has been “enclosed as produced.”

In contrast, the report discussed Mr. Sukeshan’s “finger-pointing” statement that arguably hinted that Mr. Reddy had compelled him to drop the case against Mr. Mani. Mr. Reddy viewed the release of the culled report without his statement as a malicious attempt to prejudice the court and the public against him.

Mr. Reddy said he had found glaring discrepancies between the findings of the IO and the facts available on record after he took over as director, VACB.

For one, the questions given to a key witness during a lie detector test appeared framed to elicit set answers. The mobile phone locations of many key players in the controversy did not match their stated whereabouts at the time of collecting the bribe or making the alleged backhander payments.

Mr. Reddy prepared a “scrutiny note” asking the IO to clarify the points. The note and his careful vetting of recorded evidence could not be construed as an attempt to derail the probe. Mr. Sukeshan himself concluded that there was no evidence to indict Mr. Mani for corruption.

Mr. Sukeshan had created a smoke screen to cover up the incongruities in his investigation. A Crime Branch inquiry has indicated that the IO had allegedly connived with Biju Ramesh, the de-facto complainant, to foist the case on Mr. Mani for their unknown ends, he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.