Plea seeking rejection of report absolving Abraham admitted

January 13, 2017 06:20 pm | Updated 06:20 pm IST - Thiruvananthapuram:

A special court here on Friday admitted a plea seeking the rejection of the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) report that exonerated Additional Chief Secretary, Finance, K.M. Abraham from any wrongdoing in an illegal amassment of wealth complaint against him.

Sasthamangalam R. Ajith Kumar, counsel for de-facto complainant Jomon Puthenpurackal, told Inquiry Commissioner and Special Judge A. Badharudheen that the VACB had “arbitrarily selected” 2000-09 as the check period to “help the suspect official.”

He argued that the VACB should have inquired into the “entire acquisitions” of Mr. Abraham after he joined civil service. Instead, the agency limited the scope of its inquiry to a brief period to absolve the bureaucrat, he alleged.

Mr. Ajith Kumar sought to disparage the financial statements filed periodically by Mr. Abraham and attempted to punch holes in the claims made by the senior bureaucrat in his relevant communications to the government.

The high profile pre-cursory inquiry against Mr. Abraham had been marred with controversies. The VACB had inspected his apartment without prior notice and in his absence. The examination had appalled his wife, who was alone at home at the time. The controversy had forced VACB Director Jacob Thomas to issue a show cause notice to the inspecting officer.

The agency had also questioned Mr. Abraham several times. He had reportedly stated that the amassment of wealth complaint against him was part of a conspiracy to discredit him. He saw it as a reprisal for unearthing big ticket corruption in the Kerala State Cashew Development Corporation (KSCDC).

The VACB, in its report, had debunked the complainant’s theory that Mr. Abraham had constructed a three-storey apartment in Kollam and purchased a flat in Mumbai using ill-gotten wealth. It said the apartment was built by his brothers, both high-earning NRIs, and his flat in Mumbai and Thiruvananthapuram were purchased using loans raised on the strength of his legitimate earnings and inheritance. The court would hear the case again on January 28.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.