A policeman and a Special Police Officer (SPO) arrested in connection with the Kathua rape and murder case have moved the Jammu and Kashmir High Court seeking a fresh CBI probe into the matter and quashing of the investigation by the State Crime Branch.
Sub-Inspector Anand Dutta and SPO Deepak Khajuria were arrested for allegedly destroying evidence related to the rape and killing of an eight-year-old girl in the State’s Kathua district.
A petition was filed in the High Court in this regard on April 23 by their counsel Veenu Gupta.
The petitioners pleaded that the Crime Branch probe be quashed as it had been shifted on three occasions from the local police to it, and finally to a Special Investigation Team (SIT).
It is strange that a policeman, who was involved in a rape and murder case a few years ago and evaded arrest for three years despite being an officer, was a member of the SIT, the petition said.
The officer’s subsequent acquittal in a trial court for lack of evidence is a matter of record, it said.
Despite the sensitivity of the case, he is member of the probe panel, the petitioners said, while pleading for a fresh CBI probe in the case.
The petition said there were “huge differences” in the post-mortem and forensic reports and stated that the Crime Branch probe was “incorrect”.
The petitioners also objected to the Crime Branch findings that the girl was kept at a ‘devasthan’ and alleged that the SIT had tampered and planted evidence.
They also alleged that the main aim of the probe was to facilitate encroachment of government land by tribal people.
The body of the girl, from a minority community, was recovered from a forest in Kathua on January 17, a week after she went missing.
On January 23, the government had handed over the case to the Crime Branch that formed the SIT and arrested eight people, including the Sub-Inspector and the SPO, who were charged with destruction of evidence.
Jammu has been tense since the incident and the bar association has opposed the arrests alleging “targeting of minority Dogras”.
The trial in the matter began on April 17.
