Yettinahole project is unscientific and won’t have expected results: Biologist

N.A. Madhyastha says the river diversion project could damage the flora and fauna of the region

November 18, 2016 12:00 am | Updated December 02, 2016 04:11 pm IST - Manipal:

Environmental biologist N.A. Madhyastha said on Thursday that the Yettinahole project, also called as the Netravati River Diversion Project, is unscientific and, if implemented, would leave lasting damage on the fragile flora and fauna of the region.

The project is aimed at providing water from Yettinahole (Netravati) to the parched districts of south Karnataka.

Dr. Madhyastha was delivering a special talk on ‘Ecology of Yettinahole: The story of a controversial river diversion project’, organised by the Centre for Gandhian and Peace Studies, Manipal University, in association with Adelphi, Berlin.

He said what happens to the Western Ghats would have an impact on Yettinahole, and vice-versa. “A river recharges the underground aqueduct, tanks and wells. It provides a habitat to lesser-known species and aquatic animals,” he said.

Yettinahole region is home to a large number of plants, mammals, birds, frogs, butterflies, fish and snails. The Lion-Tailed Macaque, which was an endangered species, is seen here. “In fact, the Yettinahole region is most eco-sensitive and needs to be protected,” Dr. Madhyastha said.

The Yettinahole project envisages the construction of eight dams and its impact on the flora and fauna is bound to be negative, he said. The proposed Devarayanadurga reservoir could submerge 1,200 hectares of land, of which 50 per cent are forest land and two villages.

‘Based on false data’

He said the way the project was envisaged presently, no water would reach Kolar. The only way the government can get some water to Kolar is by pumping more from Netravati river. “This project is based on false statistics and assumptions,” Dr. Madhyastha opined.

He added that the project will even impact the water flow in Kumaradhara river. The construction would affect the elephant corridor in the region, which should not be disturbed. Already, there have been instances of man-elephant conflict at Alur in Sakleshpur. Change in the quality of habitat would push lesser-known animals to extinction, he said.

Since there will be less water in the Netravati because of the project, wells and ponds are bound to dry up in Dakshina Kannada region. It will bring down agricultural production, and stagnation of water could lead to a spurt in mosquito-borne diseases in the region, he said.

Instead of spending Rs. 13,000 crore on the project, whose success is doubtful, the government should decide to not disturb Yettinahole, he said. “Yettinahole, in its present splendid form, is invaluable. It is better to go in for small eco-friendly projects,” Dr. Madhyastha said.

Varadesh Hiregange, director of the Centre for Gandhian and Peace Studies, was present.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.