Women in ZP want spouses to have a say at meetings

Bidar ZP passes resolution against officer who did not want men to stand in for their wives

September 16, 2013 03:07 am | Updated June 02, 2016 12:23 pm IST - Bidar

Bidar Zilla Panchayat on Friday passed a resolution against an officer who had refused to allow spouses of women members to stand in for them in meetings and functions.

The panchayat members, through the resolution, urged the government to transfer Ujjwal Kumar Ghosh, Chief Executive Officer.

There were voices of disapproval at the meeting against the officer’s “disrespect” for women members’ husbands. There was an argument that women have several responsibilities at home, and therefore, cannot attend every government function or meeting. The women members argued that their husbands should be allowed to stand in for them on such occasions, and that this was the practice across the State.

This is not the first time that the issue has come up in a panchayat meeting. Two years ago, Yadgir Zilla Panchayat passed a resolution urging the government to allow spouses of women panchayat members to accompany them to official meetings as most of them were uneducated and needed help.

Women members in the Yadgir Taluk Panchayat did not attend meetings for a year after the executive officer refused to grant their husbands permission to attend meetings.

Legal experts say the officials are right in their decision and the women panchayat members are wrong.

“The concept of reserving some seats for women is to increase women’s participation in the decision-making process. Allowing men to take their place would kill the spirit behind this idea,” C.S. Dwarakanath, former chairman of the Karnataka State Backward Commission, said.

C.S. Vedamani, convenor of Samarasa, NGO fighting for women’s rights, says: “For decades, women’s organisations have been demanding 33 per cent reservation for women in Parliament and State legislatures. Are we doing it so that once this is implemented, the spouses of women MPs will come and sit in Parliament in their places?” She demanded action against the zilla panchayat for making such demands.

Patriarchy, feudalism

K. Neela, Janawadi Mahila Sanghatane president, said that the episode smacks of patriarchy and feudalism, suggesting that women cannot trade their domestic responsibilities for an opportunity in public service?

“It is another way of saying women should stay at home and aspire for nothing else,” she said.

She pointed out that it also suggests that women public representatives are not considered “working” women. “Women members in the zilla panchayat are still seen as housewives or mothers who are expected to finish their job in the kitchen before stepping out,” Ms. Neela said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.