Third judge upholds disqualification of BJP rebels

October 29, 2010 03:40 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 10:50 am IST - Bangalore

Bangalore: 29/10/2010. Law Minister Suresh Kumar speaking to media after the High Court Judgement, In a major boost for the BJP government in the state, a third judge in the Karnataka High Court today upheld the disqualification of 11 rebel BJP MLAs, in Bangalore on Friday.Photo: G.P.Sampath Kumar

Bangalore: 29/10/2010. Law Minister Suresh Kumar speaking to media after the High Court Judgement, In a major boost for the BJP government in the state, a third judge in the Karnataka High Court today upheld the disqualification of 11 rebel BJP MLAs, in Bangalore on Friday.Photo: G.P.Sampath Kumar

The rebel cause suffered a setback on Friday when a judge of the Karnataka High Court upheld the October 10, 2010 order of Speaker K.G. Bopaiah that disqualified 11 BJP rebels from Assembly membership.

Reading out the operative portion of the judgment, Justice V.G. Sabhahit said he concurred with the views of Chief Justice J.S. Khehar upholding the disqualification. He ordered that the judgment be placed before the Division Bench, which gave a split verdict on October 18, for pronouncement.

The case was referred to Justice Sabhahit after the Bench of Justices Khehar and N. Kumar differed on the disqualification issue. While the Chief Justice held that the Speaker had the power under Section 2 (1) (a) of the Tenth Schedule to disqualify the rebels, Justice N. Kumar set aside the Speaker's order.

Disagreeing with Justice Kumar, Justice Sabhahit said the letters given by the rebels to the Governor indicated that they intended to voluntarily give up their BJP membership. “Their conduct is incompatible with the continuance of their membership in the BJP.”

Justice Sabhahit said he agreed with the Chief Justice that the MLAs could not contend that they had no confidence in the Chief Minister, even while remaining members of the party, especially when they had unanimously elected Mr. Yeddyurappa leader of the Legislature Party.

On the letter of the rebels to the Governor, he said: “It is clear that the intention of the petitioners was to bring to the notice of the Governor that a contingency has arisen to initiate action under Article 356 …, and they are withdrawing support to the government.”

Justice Sabhahit said when voters cast their vote, they elected a person with the expectation that the political party which had put him up should come to power. Therefore, political propriety and morality demanded that if the conduct of a person was incompatible with the loyalty expected by his party and the voter, he should be disqualified, and he should go before the electorate.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.