Shivakumar's brother allotted plot by judicial employees' society

Allotment cancelled, says Congress leader

May 10, 2012 12:08 pm | Updated July 11, 2016 03:45 pm IST - BANGALORE

Apart from the former Lokayukta Shivaraj V. Patil and the former Upalokayuktas R. Gururajan and Chandrashekaraiah, it has now emerged that relatives of powerful politicians too were allotted plots by the Karnataka Judicial Department Employees' House Building Cooperative Society despite the fact that they were never employees of the State Judicial Department.

Documents available with The Hindu show that D.K. Suresh, brother of Congress leader D.K. Shivakumar, was allotted a 2,400 sq ft plot at Yelahanka by the society on September 4, 2000. The sale deed shows that Mr. Suresh paid Rs. 61,598 for the plot.

The allotment was made at a time when Mr. Shivakumar was Minister for Co-operation in the Cabinet of S.M. Krishna. The allotment to Mr. Suresh appears to be in violation of Clause 10 of the Model Bye-laws for housing societies laid down by the State government. For, this clause dictates that an allottee must necessarily be an employee of the organisation for whose employees the society has been formed. Further, the clause stipulates that the allottee must have “put in a minimum continuous or intermittent service of five years in Karnataka”.

In a judgment in the case of Narayana Reddy versus State of Karnataka, 1991, a Division Bench headed by Justice Rama Jois had held: “In case of house building societies formed in respect of employees of any organisation or industry, the membership should be confined to the employees who may continue as members even after retirement and the societies should be prohibited from enrolling outsiders as members.”

Unlike in all other sale deeds, there is no mention of the membership number, even though the sale deed says that Mr. Suresh, one such member-applicant, has paid the said amount from time to time. Mr. Shivakumar, in his response, said that the allotment made to his brother has been cancelled. When it was pointed out that the encumbrance certificate continues to show that his brother is the owner of the plot, he reiterated, “The allotment has been cancelled.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.