High Court initiates PIL on out-of-school children

April 02, 2013 01:53 am | Updated November 17, 2021 04:18 am IST - Bangalore:

BANGALORE - 22.06.2011 :   Children work along with their parents, at an apartments built by Karnataka Slum Clearance Board for Ambedkarnagar slum dwellers, at Nayandahalli, off Mysore road in South western part of Bangalore, on June 22, 2011.  How effective is the implementation of Right to Education Act (RTE Act), to the children from unorganised migrant labours.   Photo K. Murali Kumar.

BANGALORE - 22.06.2011 : Children work along with their parents, at an apartments built by Karnataka Slum Clearance Board for Ambedkarnagar slum dwellers, at Nayandahalli, off Mysore road in South western part of Bangalore, on June 22, 2011. How effective is the implementation of Right to Education Act (RTE Act), to the children from unorganised migrant labours. Photo K. Murali Kumar.

The Karnataka High Court on Monday ordered issue of notice to the State government while suo motu treating as a public interest litigation petition a report, “The glitches that dog RTE implementation”, in The Hindu on March 31 based on a State-level meet on the RTE Act held in the city recently.

The report said that during the meet, organised by the People’s Alliance for Right to Education (PAFRE), a facilitator of the organisation, quoting government’s figures, had stated that “54,000 children are still out of school…” “If the news item is correct, then it is a serious violation on a massive scale. About 54,000 children are not going to schools means that they may be engaged as child labourers and in other activities… their future is dark,” a Division Bench comprising Chief Justice D.H. Waghela and Justice B.V. Nagarathna orally observed during the hearing.

It has been pointed out in the petition that a large number of students being out of school would mean that provisions of the RTE Act are not being properly implemented.

The Bench directed the government to file its affidavit and also to ascertain details about the PAFRE so that it could be treated as intervener in the present proceedings to assist the court.

The court has appointed advocate Aditya Sondhi as amicus curiae in the matter.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.