ED says no to UBHL petition for selling seized shares

HC asks official liquidator ‘not to precipitate’ matter on liquidation

April 26, 2017 12:24 am | Updated 12:24 am IST - Bengaluru

BANGALORE, 11/12/2007: A view of Karnataka High Court in Bangalore.
Photo: V. Sreenivasa Murthy 11-12-2007

BANGALORE, 11/12/2007: A view of Karnataka High Court in Bangalore. Photo: V. Sreenivasa Murthy 11-12-2007

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Tuesday informed the High Court of Karnataka that it cannot agree for sale of certain shares, seized by it from United Breweries (Holdings) Ltd., till the conclusion of confiscation proceedings in the case of money laundering booked against Vijay Mallya and others, and conclusion of trial under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act.

A written statement was submitted before a Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Subhro Kamal Mukherjee and Justice P.S. Dinesh Kumar during the appeal filed by UBHL against the order for winding up the company. ED Special Public Prosecutor S. Mahesh, in the written statement, said that “in view of the fact that the ED had reasons to believe on the materials in their possession that the appellant [UBHL] was in possession of proceeds of crime, they had initiated attachment proceedings as per Section 5(5) of the Act, which has been confirmed by the Adjudicating Authority.”

Under these circumstances, the statement said: “the ED is not empowered to permit the sale of attached properties, which are shares in this case, in favour of the appellant for any purpose much less for the purpose of selling it and to disburse the sale proceeds to its debtors or the same to be deposited before the court.”

While requesting the court to reject UBHL’s plea for selling shares, the ED stated that “severe harm and injury” would be caused to ED whereas no such harm would be caused to UBHL.

Following this, the Bench directed the Official Liquidator, who is set to take charge of UBHL based on the order for liquidation, not to precipitate the matter, while deciding to continue hearing of the appeal after court’s summer vacation in June.

The UBHL proposed to deposit the amount, which could be realised by selling the seized shares, before the court to demonstrate that it is a going concern and to convince the Division Bench to stay the order of winding up the company passed by a single judge.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.