Court refuses to interfere with lateral entry rules

August 17, 2013 12:10 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 08:48 pm IST - Bangalore:

The Karnataka High Court has refused to interfere with the rule that two years of work experience after completing a diploma course is mandatory to join the Bachelor of Engineering course in the second year through lateral entry.

A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice D.H. Waghela and Justice B.V. Nagarathna on Wednesday refused to interfere with the June 13 order of the single judge, which too had refused to interfere with the Rule 3(4) of the Karnataka Selection of Candidates for admission to government seats in professional educational institutions (Amendment) Rules 2012.

The main reason for the court’s refusal to interfere with the eligibility criteria was the dictum of the apex court that courts should keep their hands off subjects such as fixation of education qualification as it was the domain of experts in that field.

Byre Gowda H. and 14 others, who are doing a diploma course in engineering in evening colleges had questioned the rule. They contended that the All-India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) has prescribed only a diploma with minimum two year fulltime work experience in a registered firm/company/industry/educational and/government autonomous organisation in the relevant field for seeking admission to the BE course under the lateral entry scheme. They said the AICTE rule did not say whether the students should have work experience before or after completing the diploma course.

They argued that the government’s rule could apply only to diploma students studying in day colleges and not those in evening colleges. It requires three years of experience to do a diploma course in evening colleges.

Contention

While the State government contended that the work experience acquired after securing a diploma would alone have nexus with the lateral admission to the B.E course, the AICTE pointed out that States had the liberty to prescribe higher qualification as the AICTE prescribed minimum qualification.

The Division Bench said the single judge considered all the issues and rightly refused to interfere in the matter as per the apex court’s dictum and dismissed the appeal filed by the students.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.