JNU row: Jaitley targets Rahul in Rajya Sabha

Mr. Jaitley defends police entry into the JNU, arguing that the campus was not a "sovereign territory" like some foreign embassy.

February 25, 2016 07:34 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 02:07 am IST - New Delhi

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley speaks in the Rajya Sabha on Thursday.

Finance Minister Arun Jaitley speaks in the Rajya Sabha on Thursday.

With government under intense attack over the JNU issue, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on Thursday trained his guns at Rahul Gandhi, suggesting that his visit to the campus in the aftermath of the controversial protest amounted to providing “respectability” to a movement whose charter was to break India.

He also suggested in the Rajya Sabha that the Congress, jointly with the Left parties, had jumped into the issue “without giving prior thought” in view of the upcoming Assembly elections in West Bengal.

Mr. Jaitley defended the police entry into the JNU, arguing that the campus was not a “sovereign territory” like some foreign embassy.

Seeking to turn tables on the Congress, he cited a Parliament Question of 1983 in which the then Indira Gandhi government had justified entry of police into the JNU and arrest of 350 students, including 50 girls, after the Vice-Chancellor was gheraoed.

He contended that the developments of February 9, 2016 on the JNU were “much more serious” as he read out the pamphlets carrying anti-India material which were circulated in the campus.

“The core question is, are we going to give respectability to those whose primary ideology is that they want to break this country,” Mr. Jaitley said while intervening in the debate on the “situation arising out of recent incidents in institutions of higher education with reference to the JNU and University of Hyderabad”.

Referring to slogans which called for war for destruction of the country and lauded terrorists who had been convicted by the highest judiciary, Mr. Jaitley questioned: “Can hate speech be called free speech?”

He noted that being a mainstream party, the Congress does not have the history of supporting the “fringe”.

Mr. Jaitley agreed with Congress leader Ghulam Nabi Azad that two Congress Prime Ministers had fallen to the terrorists’ bullets, a reference to Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi, and said, “That precisely should have been the reason for you (Congress) to speak more vigorously against the offences in JNU. At least on this issue, we expected you to be with us.”

Suggesting that the Congress had done so in view of West Bengal polls, he quipped, “The tragedy of Bengal is that there are three Congress parties — the Congress, the Trinamool Congress and Congress Marxist.”

Trinamool Congress leader Derek O’Brien took objection to this, reminding that his party was separate since 1998.

Mr. Jaitley asked opposition parties not to “camouflage” the offence at the JNU, saying “it’s a very serious offence...One is jihadist, the other is maoist. Its an alliance of the two. You have been in power for long, you should have thought before making a visit to the JNU campus”.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.