News » National

Updated: March 14, 2012 00:43 IST

It’s not in violation of federal principles: Chidambaram

J. Balaji
Comment (2)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
Home Minister P. Chidambaram leaves Parliament House on the first day of the Budget Session. File photo
Home Minister P. Chidambaram leaves Parliament House on the first day of the Budget Session. File photo

The Union government does not believe that the setting up of the National Counter-Terrorism Centre (NCTC) has violated any federal principles or State rights, Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram said in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday.

“On the contrary, the NCTC will be a mechanism, [through which] the shared responsibility of the Central government and the State governments to fight terrorism can be achieved,” he asserted.

“We can debate the matter, but I am quite clear in my mind that the NCTC, or a similar centre, is an absolute necessity to fight terrorism…Even those [States] that opposed certain aspects of the Office Memorandum (OM) supported the principle of the NCTC…I do not think that the NCTC violates the federal rights or the rights of the States.”

Replying to a question, he said that at a meeting of the Chief Secretaries and the Directors-General of Police with Union Home Secretary R.K. Singh in New Delhi on Monday, even the States that had raised specific and pertinent questions about certain issues in the Office Memorandum, by and large, welcomed the idea.

“The NCTC and the manner in which it will function are two separate issues. I think the idea of an NCTC is an unexceptional idea,” he said. There were differences of opinion over how the NCTC would function. “But I am absolutely confident that with discussions, these differences…can be narrowed down, and we can arrive at a consensus by which the NCTC can be operationalised.”

Mr. Chidambaram said the matter would be discussed further at a meeting of the Chief Ministers on internal security scheduled here for April 16.

When Leader of the Opposition Sushma Swaraj, quoting a report in an English newspaper, claimed that the Home Secretary had told the Chief Secretaries at Monday's meeting not to act merely as stenographers of their governments (on the NCTC), Mr. Chidambaram said he had spoken to Mr. Singh, and he categorically denied having made such a statement.

Ms. Swaraj said 10 States were against the establishment of the NCTC.

Kalyan Banerjee of the Trinamool Congress said the government should not go ahead with its plan and withdraw the Office Memorandum till the debate on the Centre's “attempt” to encroach upon the States' rights ended positively.

Earlier, in a written reply, Mr. Chidambaram said the Chief Ministers of Odisha, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Gujarat, Tripura, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand and Karnataka had written to the Centre alleging that the order had encroached upon the domain of the States and calling for consultations with the State governments before the NCTC was operationalised. Their concerns centred on Section 43(A) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and the powers of the Standing Council. The States asked the Centre to specify the circumstances under which Section 43(A) could be invoked.

Later, taking part in the debate on the motion of thanks to the President for her address to Parliament, Rajnath Singh of the BJP said that instead of evolving a consensus on the issue, the government was adopting an attitude of “confrontation.” “The government's mentality is such that it is not even ready to accept the constructive support of the Opposition.”

Shailendra Kumar of the Samajwadi Party said his party was also opposed to the idea. This statement is significant as SP has just captured power in Uttar Pradesh.

More In: National | News

In Democracy, Home Minister P. Chidambaram would have called for all Chief Ministers meeting on NCTC before the ministers call it as scheme (NCTC). Why Home Minister failed to do so? rather than doing a postmurtum to force on every state? Definately people of India think that its politics of caste and language rather than national security. We have enough LAWS in India, only thing is we are weak or failed in implementation of it. We do not need any more new NCTC etc. Example; later PM told in an interview that Khandahar plan hijack can handle by a local Sub Inspector. But our systems failed to do so, so PM and Home Minister involved in to to politicise it for the benefit of the parties but not the national interest. Thanks, Kumar

from:  kumar
Posted on: Mar 13, 2012 at 16:04 IST

If this is the bone of contention by the 10 Chief Ministers, then how about their Police forces go to another State in pursuit of criminals and nab them. Look at the recent episode of TN Police going to West Bengal and arresting few persons allegedly involved in a heist in Tirupur. Should Ms Mamata Banerjee protest to another Chief Minister, Ms J. Jayalalithaa? If terrorists can move across not only State borders but also international borders effortlessly, is there no need to have a specialized agency having access to whole lot of information, compared to a State police force to act fast and decisively to neutralize the terrorists. Of course, NCTC should not become another weapon (follow the way other agencies under the aegis of Central Government function) in the hands of Central government and sufficient checks should be built into its functioning to alleviate the apprehension of the States. Let us not forget that 'Law and Order' is not the sole responsibility of State governments, Central government has the moral responsibility to ensure that this duty is discharged by the State governments impartially but appears to be so. The fact is that more often than not State police is the hand-maiden of the person at the helm of affairs in States. Why the Police Reforms proposed by the Supreme Court is not being carried out by the States? Is it not an example of the feudal mentality prevailing at State Capitals and Central Government, that refuses to let go of the vice like grip on these state organs?

from:  G Narayanasamy
Posted on: Mar 13, 2012 at 14:36 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Avian Influenza Outbreak

More Avian Influenza Outbreak »


Tamil Nadu

Andhra Pradesh





Recent Article in National

Prime Minister Narendra Modi told the House that India had conveyed to Pakistan in the “strongest possible words” its shock at this development.

LS condemns Lakhvi bail

liftout tag with dummy text liftout tag with dummy text liftout tag with »