Ishrat case: Gujarat DGP asks police to trade Pandey

August 09, 2013 04:24 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 08:52 pm IST - Ahmedabad

Students hold a candle light protest to demand justice for Ishrat Jahan, in New Delh. File photo; Sushil Kumar Verma

Students hold a candle light protest to demand justice for Ishrat Jahan, in New Delh. File photo; Sushil Kumar Verma

The Gujarat DGP has asked all district Superintendents of Police as well as city police commissioners to help the CBI trace Additional DGP (Crime) P.P. Pandey, who has been named as one of the main accused in the 2004 Ishrat Jahan fake encounter killing case, and also declared as an absconder by the local court.

“Two days back, the CBI requested us to help them trace P P Pandey after he went missing suddenly. Subsequently, we sent letters to all district Superintendents of Police and Police Commissioners asking them to keep a vigil to trace him,” Gujarat Police Chief Amitabh Pathak told PTI on Friday.

In his letter to all district and city police chiefs, the Gujarat state DGP directed them to increase vigil at all locations and take action in accordance with the law if they spot Pandey.

He has been absconding since April this year and a CBI special court also declared him “proclaimed absconder”.

He had resurfaced before the trial court on July 29, after the Supreme Court directed him to be present before the concerned court while rejecting his petition to quash the FIR against him.

Pandey had appeared before the court on a stretcher, directly from a local private hospital, where he was admitted after he complained of chest pain and other complications.

For a few days he attended court in a wheelchair, but suddenly went missing after his applications for exemption from appearance in the trial court and seeking anticipatory bail were rejected by the CBI court here on Wednesday.

On Thursday last, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate of the CBI court had issued a non—bailable warrant for Pandey’s arrest and the high court had also rejected his petition challenging the CBI court’s ruling of denying him anticipatory bail.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.