India non-cooperative in taking back illegal immigrants: US Senator

June 28, 2016 10:00 am | Updated September 16, 2016 04:53 pm IST - Washington

A top American Senator has asked the Obama Administration to discontinue issuing immigrant and non-immigrant visas to citizens from 23 countries, including India and China, alleging that these nations are non-cooperative in taking back illegal immigrants from the US.

Republican Senator Senate Chuck Grassley in a letter to the Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson said the Obama Administration has failed to use authority “to hold accountable those countries that won’t take back their own citizens who have been ordered removed from the US.”

He said this has allowed thousands of criminals to be released into US communities.

“Many times, these individuals have criminal histories in addition to entering the country illegally or overstaying their visa,” Grassley said.

“Dangerous criminals, including murderers, are being released every day because their home countries will not cooperate in taking them back,” he said in the letter.

In fiscal year 2015 alone, 2,166 individuals were released in the US because of this decision and the non—cooperation from recalcitrant countries; more than 6,100 were released in the preceding two years, Grassley, who is the Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman said.

Currently, 23 countries are labelled by the US as uncooperative, with the top five most recalcitrant countries being Cuba, China, Somalia, India, and Ghana, Grassley said.

In addition, US Immigrations and Customs Enforcement is monitoring another 62 nations where cooperation is strained, but which are not yet deemed recalcitrant.

In the letter to Johnson, Grassley reminded him that, Congress addressed this problem when it enacted section 243(d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act.

“Under section 243(d), the Secretary of State is required to discontinue granting immigrant or non—immigrant visas to a country upon receiving notice from you that the country has denied or is unreasonably delaying accepting a citizen, subject, national or resident of that country,” he said.

“This tool has been used only once, in the case of Guyana in 2001, where it had an immediate effect, resulting in obtaining cooperation from Guyana within two months,” Grassley said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.