It also notes several "good practices" which would be shared with the global nuclear industry
The safety review of units 3 and 4 of the atomic power station at Rawatbhata in Rajasthan by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has ended with the inspection team identifying certain deficiencies in the operations of the units.
The team has found problems in the maintenance of the fire doors and electrical cables and has flagged a need for improvements in certain aspects of the surveillance-testing programme and the system for root cause analyses.
In a statement on Wednesday, team leader Miroslav Lipar said a number of recommendations and suggestions were made.
“Examples [of areas requiring improvement] include the following: the plant should enhance actions to maintain electrical cable conditions to a high standard; the fire door inspection and maintenance programme should be enhanced to identify and correct fire door function; certain aspects of the plant’s surveillance testing programme should be further enhanced; and the plant should enhance root-cause analyses to systematically identify all learning opportunities,” he said.
He said the plant management expressed its determination to address all the areas identified for improvements and requested that the IAEA schedule a follow-up mission in about 15 months.
However, the team also identified several “good practices” which would be shared by the IAEA with the global nuclear industry for their benefit in due course.
Examples of good practice included the safety culture of the plant, which cultivated a constructive work environment and a sense of accountability among the personnel and gave the staff opportunity to expand skills and training.
In addition, the public awareness programme provided educational opportunities to the local community about nuclear and radiation safety; the plant had a system for effective management of training activities and it used testing facilities and mock-ups to improve the quality of maintenance work and reduce radiation dose.
The team, he said, had provided the plant management with a draft of its recommendations, suggestions and good practices in the form of technical notes for their comments. The notes would be reviewed by the IAEA headquarters including any comments received from the plant management on them. The final report will be submitted to the Central government, within the next three months.
This is the first safety review of an Indian nuclear power plant under the IAEA’s ‘Operational Safety Review Team [OSART]’ programme. The in-depth review, which began on October 29, covered the areas of management, organisation and administration, training, operations, maintenance, technical support, operating experience, radiation protection, chemistry, emergency planning and preparedness, and severe accident management.
The review was conducted at the request of the Central government. The team comprised experts from Canada, Belgium, Finland, Germany, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Sweden, apart from the IAEA itself.
The OSART programme was launched in 1982 and teams of international experts have already conducted 170 such reviews before coming to India and Rawatbhata.
Keywords: Rawatbhata nuclear power plant, IAEA safety review, surveillance-testing programme, system for root cause analyses, OSART programme, Miroslav Lipar








The tritiated water seems to have adversely affected the population proximate(10 km around) compared to the population distant(50 km) from the Rawatbhata Nuclear Power Station as per a survey conducted by an independent body Anumukti during Sep 1989 to Sep 1981. The relative risk of disease prevalence as computed using their data is 2.14(proximate/distant). The data on pregnancy outcomes and deformities in babies is also showing very high risk in proximate villages compared to the distant villages(ref Source for data: Anumukti, Volume 6 Number 5, April/May 1993.). Either we live or the nukes! Stop nuclear power programmes. They do not give any energy to society outside the nuclear industry. See Energy audit of the Indian Nuclear Programme by Google Search. Thus we shall forever be under an energy shortage crisis forever with nukes.
I was always of the belief that "The Hindu" provides news without bias.
But, the headline for this item of news is showing an unwarranted
negative twist.
Improper and sensationalist headline. Very poor!
There is contradiction between news headlines and content.There is
always difference between 'deficiency' and 'Areas requiring
improvement'.As per the news report,the IAEA team has identified
'areas requiring improvement' and as well as 'good practices'.The news
report has not brought out the good practices in detail as done for
'areas requiring improvement'.'Areas for improvement' need not be the
system requirements.It could be even for aesthetic look of any
component.As far as operation and maintenance of any process industry
in India is concerned,nuclear power stations are benchmarks.It is
justified if the news headlines reads 'IAEA finds several good
practices and areas for improvement at Rawatbhatta nuke plant'
While the headline gives an alarming twist by stating as 'several deficiencies" the actual news content just states that many improvements were suggested for further reinforcement. Why this inconsistencny in reporting with so much 'Hullabaloo' about Nuclear Plant safety around.
Please Email the Editor