Honours uneven in Parliament debate

After the discussions in the two Houses last week, the BJP has emerged in a better shape, instead of the Opposition.

February 29, 2016 03:21 am | Updated 03:21 am IST - New Delhi:

The Centre’s interference in the University of Hyderabad, which the Opposition blamed for suicide of Dalit research scholar Rohith Vemula, followed by the arrests of Jawaharlal Nehru University Students’ Union president Kanhaiya Kumar and others on charges of sedition, should have set the stage for the Congress to call the government to account in Parliament. But after the discussions in the two Houses last week, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has emerged in a better shape.

The BJP had realised that the handling of the Hyderabad controversy by its Ministers had left it looking anti-Dalit, and hence its decision to shift focus to the JNU. The ABVP’s role in bringing up alleged anti-national protests and slogans in favour of Afzal Guru on the campus came in handy.

For the Opposition — particularly the Congress, whose vice-president Rahul Gandhi had visited both campuses — it was a golden opportunity to pin the government down in Parliament on the Dalit issue when the BJP is busy canvassing support from the community.

But thanks to a lack of coordination in the Opposition, the government succeeded in clubbing the Hyderabad and JNU controversies, giving itself an advantage that became apparent through the discussion. Indeed, the momentum against the government that was on display on the campuses and on the streets was simply not carried into Parliament.

For one, the sweeping statements made by HRD Minister Smriti Irani — now the toast of the BJP for her dramatic speech — on Rohith Vemula’s death went unchallenged by the Opposition in Parliament. It was left to the doctor who had attended on him to put the record straight on television.

Now belatedly, Opposition MPs have decided to file a privilege motion against Ms. Irani for misleading the House. But politically, the damage has been done, with her speech having gone viral, even earning her encomiums from Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Two, Mr. Gandhi chose not to speak in the House, leaving it to colleague Jyotiraditya Scindia. Mr. Scindia made an excellent speech as did other Opposition MPs such as Sugata Bose (Trinamool Congress) and Tathagata Satpathy (Biju Janata Dal).

Possibly, differences in the party on how to play the two issues caused confusion: some senior Congress leaders had warned against allowing the nationalism debate to be foregrounded, fearing it would go against the party. But in the event Mr. Gandhi and the party allowed both issues to be clubbed, that helped the BJP paper over its blunders on the Dalit issue.

Mayawati’s sole battle

Three, even in the Rajya Sabha, where the government is in a minority, Opposition MPs failed to debunk Ms. Irani’s claims. It was only Bahujan Samaj Party leader Mayawati who kept Ms. Irani in her sights, demanding that a Dalit member be included in a panel investigating Rohith’s death.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.