Govt mulls constitutional amendment on disqualification

August 09, 2013 07:44 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 02:03 am IST - New Delhi

With the Election Commission implementing the Supreme Court judgement on disqualification of convicted MLAs and MPs, government is working overtime to negate the order by seeking a review and even trying to bring parties on board for a constitutional amendment. Photo; Shanker Chakravarty

With the Election Commission implementing the Supreme Court judgement on disqualification of convicted MLAs and MPs, government is working overtime to negate the order by seeking a review and even trying to bring parties on board for a constitutional amendment. Photo; Shanker Chakravarty

With the Election Commission implementing the Supreme Court judgement on disqualification of convicted MLAs and MPs, government is working overtime to negate the order by seeking a review and even trying to bring parties on board for a constitutional amendment.

Highly placed sources in the Law Ministry said on Friday that while the government is likely to file a review in the coming days, it is also mulling the option of bringing a constitutional amendment bill if it gets the support of the political parties.

While there is unanimity among political parties against the SC verdict, government would move cautiously before amending the Constitution.

In its July 10 verdict, the apex court had struck down a provision in the electoral law that protects a convicted lawmaker from disqualification on the ground of pendency of appeal in higher courts.

It had also made it clear that MPs, MLAs and MLCs would stand disqualified on the date of conviction.

“We also hold that the provisions of Article 101(3) (a) and 190(3) (a) of the Constitution expressly prohibit Parliament to defer the date from which the disqualification will come into effect in case of a sitting member of Parliament or a State Legislature.

“Parliament, therefore, has exceeded its powers conferred by the Constitution in enacting sub-section (4) of Section 8 of the (RP) Act and accordingly sub-section (4) of Section 8 of the Act is ultra vires to the Constitution,” it had said.

The Constitutional amendment bill is likely to deal with this part of the judgement.

“Talks with various political parties are on...whatever decision is taken will be based on consensus,” Law Minister Kapil Sibal had said recently on the issue.

He had made it clear that the government may approach the apex court for a review of its order and also go for a “legislative remedy” by amending the current laws.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.