Government will not allow development agenda to be derailed: Jaitley

‘India a bright spot amid global slowdown’

April 19, 2015 12:33 am | Updated December 04, 2021 11:35 pm IST - WASHINGTON

Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley during an interview to The Hindu at World Bank, Washington.

Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley during an interview to The Hindu at World Bank, Washington.

Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said on Friday that the campaign on the “alleged” church attacks, which brought a bad name to India globally, was based mostly on erroneous media reporting. He said people within the Sangh Parivar had been warned at the highest level of the Narendra Modi government and the BJP for making irresponsible statements.

“A few of the distractions [from Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s agenda for economy and governance] are on account of irresponsible statements of some individuals. They have been seriously cautioned at the highest level in the party and the government,” he told The Hindu in an exclusive interview.

At the same time, part of the campaign was also on account of misreporting and falsehood, Mr. Jaitley said. “India globally got a bad name for the alleged attack on churches. Now that the facts have been investigated in each case, in most of them it turned out to be pure law and order issues at the domestic level, without any political or religious overtone.”

Mr. Jaitley said it was for everyone, including Union Ministers, to realise that India now had a chance to leapfrog economically and incidents of saffron bullying distracted from that agenda of the Prime Minister.

On the economy, he said indicators showed India was in recovery mode but not everything had become perfect. “At times, patchy signals do emerge … Some signals like exports are also because of the weak global demand and they are attributable to global factors, but overall nobody can deny that in the midst of the global slowdown situation, India is one of the bright spots.”

Mr. Jaitley said that besides focussing on infrastructure spending, he intended to introduce corporatisation of ports. Once resources were available, he would like to focus on investing in irrigation.

On the opposition to the dilution of the consent clause through amendments proposed to the land acquisition law, he said: “How would you get consent if the industrial corridor — let us say between Bangalore and Hyderabad — is to be created…? Will you go in for consent of one lakh people? Therefore, you have to balance the private interest with the larger interest of society. India has to take a decision whether it wants to keep its poor in poverty or it wants to urbanise, industrialise, wants to create urban-like facilities in rural areas…”

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.