A breakthrough in the four-day-old parliamentary gridlock seemed in sight with the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, now confident of its numbers, indicating that it was even prepared to debate FDI in multi-brand retail under a rule that mandates voting, if that was the only way forward.
With the Opposition still firm, the UPA’s constituents, which met on Tuesday, agreed to leave the final decision to Lok Sabha Speaker Meira Kumar even as they maintained that in principle, they were against voting on an executive decision as it would set a bad precedent in governance.
“We don’t want to set a bad precedent by putting an executive decision to vote,” Congress spokesperson P.C. Chacko said. “But if it becomes unavoidable, in the interest of the smooth functioning of Parliament, then we are prepared [for that eventuality]. The UPA allies have expressed their solidarity with this view.”
The meeting of the UPA allies — and its outcome — sets the stage for a meeting between Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kamal Nath and Leader of the Opposition in the Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley on Wednesday to work out the modalities.
Emerging from the hour-long meeting, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, responding to a question on the Opposition’s insistence on a discussion with voting, said the government was “not concerned” about it, and “yes, we are confident of our numbers.”
Dr. Singh’s confidence stems from the fact that the UPA, as Mr. Nath said, “is fully united on any decision of the Speaker and the government... All constituents are firmly behind the government… The government is not averse to discussion under any rule. We are not concerned about voting.” He also pointed out that at Monday’s all-party meeting, “a larger number was in favour of [the nature of the] discussion to be decided by the Speaker.”
Union Home Minister and Leader of the House Sushilkumar Shinde said: “By Monday, everything would be decided and settled.”
The metaphorical spring in the Congress step also comes from the fact that its ally, the 18 MP-strong Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), has assured the government of its support, albeit “with bitterness,” as it feels that the more overwhelming political need is to keep the BJP at bay.
“The UPA government’s continuance is a must in the present situation. Though we have differences on FDI, we’ll support the government to avert the UPA’s fall. We do not want to give room for the BJP to come to power,” DMK chief M. Karunanidhi said in a three-page statement, two days after Congress emissary Ghulam Nabi Azad met him in Chennai.
With the DMK coming to the UPA’s rescue, taking its numbers to 255, and both the Bahujan Samaj Party and the Samajwadi Party, which provide it with critical outside support, already having said they would leave it to the Speaker to decide whether to permit voting or not, the government is now in a comfortable position.
Of course, the BSP’s support on FDI comes with a rider — it wants the bill on reservation in government job promotions tabled in Parliament first, something the SP is opposing tooth and nail, as it will affect its core vote base. To demonstrate its good intentions, the government listed the quota bill in the Rajya Sabha on Monday. But the numbers are such that the government needs the active support of either the SP or the BSP. If the other party abstains, it will be through. Besides, the Trinamool Congress may abstain in case of a vote as it currently does not wish to be seen in the company of either the BJP — with West Bengal’s 30 per cent Muslim vote — or the Left Parties, its main political rival in the State.
Keywords: FDI issue, FDI debate, UPA meeting, Manmohan Singh, Winter Session








Its well proved that FDI has both positive and negative effect. In long
term negative impact is more probable. All people should really come and
protest against FDI as this can create thousands of people unemployed.
The party like DMK is nowhere now, they are just forced to support FDI
as they don't have any ground left in Tamilnadu left - its DMK's more
political motive and this way they are spoiling their chance to comeback
in general elections. I am expecting they will grasp less than 5 seats
in TN
Investing INR 1000 crore through FDI will give a return of almost
10000 crore during course of 15 years. This was the case with HUTCH
and Vodafone, Hutch brought BPL for $1.15 billion (INR 2500 crore)in
2005. And HUTCH Vodafone valuation was INR 11, 000 crore in 2007. Why
should we allow our self to be exploited. All that is needed is perseverance, When it was for Maruthi (1980's), We didn't have the
technology to develop cars, Now we have the technology, human
resources and the will. High time we believe in our self. There are
10000 of VERGHESE KURIEN HERE.
Just because we get competetive prices, the middle class ( which is myself and you) should not say yes to FDI in retail. It is known stuff that how superstores has killed mom & pop stores in United States and the livelihood in general. And also it is known that how china played a safe game to help the small retailers. Though the low prices are attractive, we never know how the FDI guys will tweak the market. It can so happen that, when all the competetion is wiped off, they may start selling higher than MRP saying operational reasons and then we would be having Hobson's choice. Saying an Yes or No to FDI in retail with out keeping long term well being of people will be to our own peril.
Already I am down and out knowing how crony capitalism is playing a role in appointment of ministers, exploiting scarce natural resources ( 2G spectrum scam) and fuel pricing . And if we fall to the bait of low prices, the private companies will wreak havoc on our daily lives for sure
If DMK is so bitter about FDI for fear that the policy could be
against peasants and farmers ,who it primarily targets during the
election,then shouldn't it target a people friendly policy rather than
keeping BJP at bay .And yes FDI will benefit the Indian agricultural
class ,only as long as the agricultural lands are within the control
of the local peasants.Already we see mass sale of agricultural lands
to corporate houses ,whose profit could increase multifold when they
own the entire process rather than buying products from peasants.
The impact will be that land owners will become workers .in the long-
range ,effective protection policies to protect farmers from corporate
houses will become necessary.i don't see FDI as a threat but i see the
way they implement the interaction between coporates and peasants as a
threat.absence of clear regulatory laws will only add to the farmer's
misery.
@R GOPALAN
Are we not capable to do the samething by our own? Why do we need foriegn companies to do such things?
It is widely known that no FDI will come for charity. No profit means
they will close the shutters and go. If this is the order of the day,
then what will happen to co-operative stores and existing trade?
Instead of fighting against irregularities in the present arrangement,
if one welcomes foreign giants to compete with poor traders of our
country and applying survival of the fittest formula, it is escapism.
A sumo master, will no doubt, crush a naive, lean and weak lad. If
the warranty and guarantee is most sought after by the middle class,
then what happened when pesticide was mixed in overdoseage in soft
drinks by multi-nationals? How many press reports were published reg.
expired food items put on sales in many super malls of MNCs in all the
metros? What was the action by the so-called quality-seeking section
then? The entry of FDI in retail will no doubt eradicate Indian
trading community as a whole and in the long run would affect our
economy.
Mr. Gopalan,You are suggesting that the whole country has to be run for the sake of urban middle class - who make up at best some 10% of the population.
There are over 85% of the population who faces moderate to severe malnutrition and they all have to run for the sake of you 10% ! And a democratically elected govt has to run the show for the 10% at the cost of 85% !
how many times for convenience we go to a neighbourhood shop and make purchases, adultarated goods, expired food products, no valid receipt, no payment of applicable tax etc. Will the transaction not be transparent in a super mall? Cant we not get right quantity as well? It has the advantage too. How about so many online shops mushrooming? When it comes to customer convenience and preference, allow the market to mature and evolve,open up. Survival of the fittest will be the order of the day. No protection can work. If it is not vote bank politics, what is so wrong in having super malls in each city. No FDI is coming for charity, when there is no business they will wind up too. It shall be like no takers in case of 2G auction, where it is not remunerative, no businessman will touch. It it just hypocracy to make noise that no FDI in retail. The urban middle class is looking for secure outing, price tag, clear policy of return, warranty, guarantee on purchase, competitive price etc.
It is duty of the Govt.to clarify The advantages and disadvantages of F.D.I.,which they are going to implement,before making any reforms What difficulty is there in putting discussion in the parliament session.It clearly visible that in retail outlets our small entrepreneur will be effected a lot.countries like India should not encourage this type of reforms which may leads to more unemployment too.
Then why are you running away and using back-door methods?
Let the house vote for FDI.
Please Email the Editor