FIR in Prajapathi case mala fide, Amit Shah tells court

‘Congress using CBI to get me arrested during Assembly polls’

October 17, 2012 11:31 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 09:22 pm IST - New Delhi:

Amit Shah

Amit Shah

Alleging that the Congress is using the CBI to have him arrested during the Gujarat Assembly polls, the former Home Minister of the State, Amit Shah, has moved the Supreme Court for a direction to quash the FIR filed by the agency in the Tulsiram Prajapathi case.

In his writ petition, Mr. Shah said the CBI, with mala fide and solely for victimising him, misconstrued the judgment and order passed by the court on April 8, 2011 while entrusting to it the investigation of the death of Prajapathi, allegedly in a fake encounter in December 2006. He said the CBI had filed a charge sheet with an ulterior motive of causing his arrest/sending him to judicial custody for the second time for the very same offence, though he had already been arrested, and released on regular bail by the Gujarat High Court holding that there was no prima facie case against him.

Mr. Shah said he had a fundamental right under Article 20 of the Constitution of not being prosecuted and arrested twice for the same offence.

The CBI, which investigated the May 2005 abduction and killing of extortionist Sohrabuddin and his wife Kausarbi, had specifically stated in the Supreme Court that Prajapathi was a key witness to the murder of Sohrabuddin, that he was the ‘third person’ who had accompanied the couple — travelling by bus from Hyderabad — and that the killing of Prajapathi was part of the same conspiracy. He was a trusted lieutenant of Sohrabuddin.

Mr. Shah said the CBI ought to have filed a supplementary charge sheet in the Sohrabuddin case but it committed a wilful and politically motivated fraud on this court and registered a fresh offence ostensibly based upon the judgment entrusting it with the Prajapathi case investigation.

Mr. Shah, who was arrested in the Sohrabuddin case, said he was interrogated also on the killing of Prajapathi. The July 23, 2010 charge sheet in the Sohrabuddin case substantiated this fact. As per the CBI’s investigation, the killings of two persons as mentioned in the first FIR and the subsequent murder of Prajapathi were part of the same conspiracy and the same chain of events under Section-220 of the Cr.PC.

Contending that the second charge sheet, dated April 29, 2001, was a mala fide exercise of power, Mr. Shah sought a direction to quash it, declaring the same contrary to the direction issued in the April 8, 2011 judgment.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.