News » National

Updated: January 28, 2011 01:54 IST

Find out the faceless persons who stashed away money abroad, court tells Centre

J. Venkatesan
Comment (2)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
The Supreme Court has sought replies from the government, the RBI and the CVC on a petition seeking direction to the government to ratify a U.N. Convention on corruption which would facilitate in bringing back black money from foreign banks. File photo
The Supreme Court has sought replies from the government, the RBI and the CVC on a petition seeking direction to the government to ratify a U.N. Convention on corruption which would facilitate in bringing back black money from foreign banks. File photo

Government taking all possible action under international agreements, says Solicitor-General

The Supreme Court on Thursday questioned the Centre what steps it took to find out the “faceless persons” who had stashed away their money in foreign banks and asked it to probe their source of money.

A Bench of Justice B. Sudershan Reddy and Justice S.S. Nijjar hearing a petition filed by the former Union Law Minister, Ram Jethmalani and others, also asked the Centre not to restrict its probe to tax evasion only and expand its scope by tracking the source of money which might have originated from anti-national activities.

Justice Reddy told Solicitor General Gopal Subramaniam: “Looking at the issue from taxation point of view is only one aspect. Some names have been given to you in respect of a bank. What steps have you taken? Have you set the law in motion? They are Indian people and are amenable to Indian law. We would like to know what action you would take to know who are the faceless persons.”

When the SG said, “We are governed by the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) and it would be difficult to get the information without the cooperation of the other countries” Justice Reddy asked, “What action have you taken against them when you came to know that they have stashed away money in LGT Bank in Liechtenstein.”

The SG, however, tried to convince the court saying “the government is taking all possible action under international agreements and taxation law against the erring persons and it has no problem in sharing the information with the court.”

Mr. Gopal Subramaniam informed the court, "We are aware that black money is a problem for the country and we are dealing with it. We have the DTAA with 79 countries and we have finalised revised agreement with other countries including Switzerland. The government has been able to prevent the outflow of around Rs. 34,000 crore out of the country because of prompt action.”

Justice Reddy asked the Centre to file a comprehensive affidavit indicating what action the government took against those who had stashed away their black money abroad; where has the money come from; whether it was routed through other countries and other details.”

Senior counsel Anil Divan, appearing for the petitioners, submitted that the government was not serious in interrogating the Pune-based businessman Hasan Ali, facing probe for stashing away money to the tune of Rs. 36,000 crore in UBS Bank in Swiss bank. This had resulted in his fleeing the country.

Mr. Jethmalani alleged that the protocol signed by India with Switzerland had made it impossible to get any information from that country. When Justice Reddy sought a copy of the protocol, Mr. Jethmalani said “he would produce a copy.”

Appearing for the former Income Tax official, K.V.M. Pai, senior counsel Krishnan Venugopal brought to the notice of the court the permission granted by the government to the Swiss government for opening a branch of UBS Bank in India though it had not fulfilled the norms prescribed by the Reserve Bank of India. He also explained how India had failed in its efforts to get back the black money stashed away abroad, while other countries were able to do so.

The Bench, after hearing counsel Meenakshi Arora, issued notice to the Centre on the petition filed by Julio F. Ribeiro and others alleging that to date India had not entered into any Tax Information Exchange Agreements (TIEAs), though it had signed comprehensive DTAAs with approximately 75 countries. The petition also sought ratification of the U.N. Convention against Corruption by the government of India which could help in complete overhaul of the black money system throughout the world.

Instead of naming and damning those who had stashed away their ill-gotten wealth in banks abroad, Government talks of some amnesty scheme to lure them to declare voluntarily and bring money! This is the attitude to the tainted citizens of the land and the same government is burdening not only the income tax payers at the lowest slabs with the burden of paying taxes, filing annual returns and sitting for years on refunds and burdening the income tax machinery with the work of dealing with these law abiding tax payees instead of spending their precious time in going after big fish with concealed and far understated income. CBDT chief should have had the independence and authority to tell the ministers about this distorted priority.

from:  S Subramanyan
Posted on: Feb 5, 2011 at 16:27 IST

This government only does not pay back IT refund for years to us!

from:  Atis D Mitra
Posted on: Jan 28, 2011 at 09:21 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Tamil Nadu

Andhra Pradesh

Other States






Recent Article in National

Chief Justice of India H.L. Dattu. File photo: R.V. Moorthy

I will not participate in NJAC, Dattu tells Modi

The CJI's refusal brings to an abrupt halt the government's plans to constitute the NJAC before May 11 as promised by it to the Constitution Bench. »