File review plea against 2G verdict: DMK to Centre

October 01, 2012 06:02 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 04:11 am IST - Chennai

CHENNAI 01/10/2012--From Left-- DMK leaders K Anbazhagan, DMK President M Karunanidhi and M K Stalin at the executive committee meeting in Chennai.  Photo: K_V_Srinivasan

CHENNAI 01/10/2012--From Left-- DMK leaders K Anbazhagan, DMK President M Karunanidhi and M K Stalin at the executive committee meeting in Chennai. Photo: K_V_Srinivasan

In an apparent move to put pressure on UPA on 2G spectrum issue which continued to haunt it, DMK on Monday asked the government to file a review petition in the Supreme Court against its verdict cancelling 122 telecom licences.

UPA’s second largest partner made the significant demand at its emergency executive here citing the recent opinion of the Supreme Court on the Presidential Reference on auction of natural resources.

“...problems relating to spectrum allocation will continue further because of the Supreme Court order”, said a resolution passed by the party whose leaders Kanimozhi, daughter of DMK patriarch M Karunanidhi and A Raja, former Telecom Minister, are facing the 2G heat.

In its opinion last week on the Presidential Reference, the Supreme Court had held that auction was not the only method of allocating natural resources to private companies and made it clear that its 2G verdict was confined to spectrum and not to other resources.

Noting that the government had withdrawn a review petition challenging the cancellation of 122 licences after the Presidential Referrence was moved, a resolution adopted at the meeting insisted that the petition be filed again immediately.

Mr. Karunanidhi’s grandnephew Dayanidhi Maran, also a former Telecom Minister, is also facing corruption charges relating to a telecom deal during his tenure.

The resolution said the review petition challenging the verdict of the two-judge bench of the apex court had stated the decision to allocate spectrum on first-come-first-serve basis was adopted following the 1999 Telecom Policy which formed the basis for the 2007 decision also.

It said the petition had also contended that the aim of first-come-first serve basis was to provide telecom services to people at affordable costs and the court’s intervention was therefore “unconstitutional“.

“In the explanation given by the five-judge bench on the Presidential Reference, the court said it was not necessary to auction resources other than spectrum. Because of this, problems pertaining to spectrum allocation further continue.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.