SEARCH

News » National

Updated: September 23, 2012 23:55 IST

FDI no threat to small retailers, says Montek

PTI
Comment (4)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
Montek Singh Ahluwalia
Montek Singh Ahluwalia

“Modern retail is an expanding segment and will more than double in a short time”

Allaying fears that opening up of the retail sector for foreign direct investment (FDI) will hurt kirana shops, Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission Montek Singh Ahluwalia said on Sunday that modern retail was an expanding segment and it would more than double in a very short time.

“I don’t think FDI in retail is a threat to small retailers. Modern retail is the expanding segment. Those who say that the small sector would be hurt, I think they are wrong by the way,” Mr. Ahluwalia said in a CNN-IBN TV programme Devil’s Advocate.

Asked about the much-hyped reform which was once opposed by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as then Leader of the Opposition in Rajya Sabha in 2002, Mr. Ahluwalia said: “I don’t recall what was said by every person on every day. Things move forward, perceptions change, circumstances change. I don’t think that there is any lack of clarity on FDI in retail. BJP was at that time pro-reform.”

Impact in Thailand

Asked about the impact of FDI in retail in Thailand where 67 per cent of the kirana shops had to be closed down, he said: “Look it is based on some studies I am not familiar with. The central point that we should make is, in a growing economy, if we have to achieve our objective of 8 per cent [economic] growth, in that kind of growth scenario, the total size of the retail market is going to be more than double in a very short time.”

Lauding the government’s decision to notify FDI in retail, Mr. Ahluwalia said: “This is a structural change. I don’t believe modern retail can expand fast enough to raise real wages. What happened in Thailand is not a predictor for what will happen here. In the next 20 to 30 years, do you want small retailers to have the same share in the market. I think it is completely wrong. This is like saying when taxis were introduced the share of tongas [horse cart] went down, one could bring them back, no.”

Asked what would be the impact on retail which is the second biggest employer in India with 44 million jobs, he said: “I think it is a complete misreading. Do you want modernisation of the retail sector or not? If you want modernisation of the retail sector, you want an upward pressure on quality of employment. Modern retail produces better quality of jobs.”

“Jobs would be created in many different sectors. Please look at studies on what is the quality of jobs in traditional retail,” Mr. Ahluwalia said.

“The quality of those jobs is very low. Young people with education who were joining the labour force will be quite happy in working for modern retail than being employed at traditional retail,” he said.

Walmart and retailers

On the apprehensions that WalMart presence could have a devastating effect on small retailers as per a global study, Mr. Ahluwalia said: “I am not talking about WalMart. It is an individual company. I think the circumstances are completely different and the reason for that is, in the U.S., it is very easy for someone to increase its share hugely by following a particular pricing policy.

“The consumer in the U.S. is geared to rush to hyper markets, buying for a week buying for a month. That won’t happen in India. The Indian case is one where modern retail has 6 per cent of the total retail market share. It would be an extraordinary achievement if they double that in five to eight years. We are least penetrated by modern retail.”

About Indian economist Jayati Ghosh’s estimate that one WalMart store would replace 1,400 small retailers at the cost of 5,000 jobs, he said: “The notion of modern retail, it may involve much higher labour productivity at the front end but at the back of that it is an entire new supply chain system where jobs are being created not in selling physically to people but in upgrading the supply. Unless you take that into account this comparison is meaningless.”

Jaitley’s concerns

About BJP leader Arun Jaitley’s concerns that foreign players will capitalise on India’s high-cost manufacturing base, Mr. Ahluwalia said: “What he is talking about is its impact. Tell him to go to Lok Nayak Bhavan, where there are a lot of small retailers, every one of them talking about Chinese goods.

“We have a huge tendency to import. Today, Indian modern retail has no compulsion to do domestic sourcing. If there is FDI, they will be compelled to do a significant amount of domestic sourcing.

Predatory pricing

On the law against predatory pricing, Mr. Ahluwalia said: “You want to go to the Indian consumer, and say I am going to have a law that prevents a retailer from lowering the price at a time when the Indian consumer is saying, do everything that lowers the price. I mean this is just nonsense.”

More In: National | News

The only good reason that the Government of India says is FDI improves the Infrastructure for Supply Chain Management. But if the Government feels this is necessary, it should be done by allocating Budget by our Government and not from the Foreign Capital.

If the Government feels, Middlemen play a major role and the Retail giants will directly trade with the farmers and minimize the role of middlemen, then why in the contrary, they don't think how the retail giants can play the same negative role on Indian farmer's life ?? Atleast in the middlemen strategy the Money is circulating within India but now our Money will be as profit to the foreigners.

Do the Government wants the Owners of a retail shop, to be the salesmen in supermarkets?? It is more of a question of pride than Money.

from:  Vignesh R
Posted on: Sep 24, 2012 at 13:00 IST

Mr Montek is the same person who said in Sept 2011 that Rs 32/day earning is enough for 'aam-aadmi's 'subsistence and based on this criteria a person earning more than Rs 32/day cannot be termed as poor.Even based on this criteria, more than 50% Indians qualify as BPL(below poverty line).Does Mr Montek think that with Rs 32 earnings/day we can shop at Walmart or similiar high-tech retail outlets that UPA Govt intends open up on priority ?
Why is Mr Montek,Mr MMS & the UPA not referring to the UNDP HDR report of 2011 wherein it was stated in no uncertain terms that this Govt must change focus of its growth to meet the aspirations of all its people & move up the HDI ranking? Among 187 countries ranked in the UNDP HDR report 2011, India comes in at a dismal 134. Is FDI in retail a priority dear Montek to move up the HDI ranking ?
Once again UPA's policy initiatives in the name of growth & development are short sighted knee-jerk reactions ,without adequate study nor thought.

from:  VJ NAMBIAR
Posted on: Sep 24, 2012 at 10:32 IST

More than 20 crore people will be affected because of this fdi, if they will create 1 job we will lose 20 to 40 jobs. Those are in retail sector are unskilled and semi skilled, they will lose job. foreign companies not going to recruit the unskilled workers.

from:  suresh
Posted on: Sep 24, 2012 at 00:31 IST

If he is not familiar in this subject, why dont we remove him from his position.

Half boil decision makers.

from:  suresh
Posted on: Sep 24, 2012 at 00:25 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
The Hindu presents the all-new Young World

In the 16th Lok Sabha Election 2014, West Bengal has witnessed some interesting trends. Apart from the debacle of the Left and the ascendance of the Trinamool Congress (AITC), the other somewhat s... »

International

Tamil Nadu

Andhra Pradesh

Karnataka

Kerala


O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in National

‘Only Security Council can disband UN mission on LoC’

Despite India’s objections to the UN observer mission at the Line of Control – UNMOGIP, visiting UN peacekeeping chief Hervé Ladsous mad... »