E-mails Kalmadi relied on were doctored: MEA

August 03, 2010 02:18 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 09:32 pm IST - New Delhi

NEW DELHI, 03/08/2010: Workers seen fixing the leaks on the roof of the newly inaugurated Weightlifting Auditorium. The Commonwealth Games has been plunged into crisis with allegations of corruption, shoddy workmanship and delays in handing over venues in New Delhi, on 03 August, 2010. Photo: V.V. Krishnan

NEW DELHI, 03/08/2010: Workers seen fixing the leaks on the roof of the newly inaugurated Weightlifting Auditorium. The Commonwealth Games has been plunged into crisis with allegations of corruption, shoddy workmanship and delays in handing over venues in New Delhi, on 03 August, 2010. Photo: V.V. Krishnan

The embattled Commonwealth Games Organising Committee (CGOC) chief Suresh Kalmadi was confronted with “doctored e-mails” when he met External Affairs Minister S.M. Krishna here on Tuesday.

Mr. Kalmadi was provided with copies of the original e-mail from the Indian High Commission in London that did not mention the name of any company. This appears to contradict Mr. Kalmadi's assertion that the CGOC had awarded a contract and made payments worth Rs. 3 crore to a company on the basis of the High Commission's recommendations.

Sources said the e-mails being relied upon by Mr. Kalmadi were not only “doctored” but they also contained glaring mistakes when additions were made to them to show that a junior High Commission official had recommended a company which was promptly given a contract for providing services during the Queen's Baton Relay in London by the CGOC.

AM Films was allegedly paid over £ 4.50 lakh without going through the tendering procedure and the attendant paper work.

The High Commission also denied recommending any company to the OC and pointed out that a junior official could hardly be authorised to do that.

Sources privy to the meeting between Mr. Krishna and Mr. Kalmadi said the latter was once again categorically told that AM Car, the company in question, was never on the panel of the High Commission. They also found it strange that a fat portion of the contract was in fact given to a subsidiary of this company AM Films rather than to the parent company.

They also felt Mr. Kalmadi should produce e-mails from the inbox or sent box of the e-mail account since they cannot be doctored. “The e-mails are all very recent. They should be able to access the inbox or the sent box and produce the original mail,” they said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.