EC turns down Team Anna's suggestion on "Right to Recall"

November 01, 2011 07:02 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 12:53 am IST - New Delhi

Chief Election Commissioner S.Y. Quraishi (centre) with Election Commissioners H.S. Brahma (left) and V.S. Sampath (right).

Chief Election Commissioner S.Y. Quraishi (centre) with Election Commissioners H.S. Brahma (left) and V.S. Sampath (right).

The Election Commission has turned down Team Anna's proposal to amend the law to introduce the “right to recall” option against non-performing elected representatives through a referendum, stating that the move would bring “instability” and “hamper developmental activities.”

Chief Election Commissioner S.Y. Quraishi and Election Commissioners V.S. Sampath and H.S. Brahma told Team Anna members — Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan, Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and Kiran Bedi — that such a move would bring instability as those who lose an election could start a campaign (for recalling the representative) from day one.

“This will also hamper development activities because of frequent elections and repeated imposition of the Model Code of Conduct,” Mr. Quraishi told the delegates when they called on the EC to discuss electoral reforms.

There were various implications involved in the implementation of the suggestion — such as the minimum percentage of voters who might file the petition for recall; verification of authenticity of thousands of signatures; whether those signatures are given voluntarily or under coercion; minimum time after which a petition for recall could be presented; the exercise of calling for a referendum in a constituency; and the holding of another election where the petition succeeds.

The delegation agreed that the matter needed review keeping all these in mind.

On the “Right to Reject” proposal, they were told by the EC that it had proposed to the government in December 2001 to introduce a button in the Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) so that electors could exercise ‘none of the above' option. The option would, however, require an amendment to the Representation of the People Act, 1951. This move might again lead to frequent elections.

The delegates, however, disagreed with the arguments saying that the right to recall would make the political parties to sponsor worthy candidates and help in curbing muscle and money power.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.