EC bribery case: Delhi police file charge sheet against Sukesh

Action against Dhinakaran only after probe is completed

July 14, 2017 10:43 pm | Updated 10:43 pm IST

Sukesh Chandrashekar

Sukesh Chandrashekar

Delhi Police Crime Branch on Friday submitted the charge sheet against alleged middleman Sukesh Chandrashekhar in the attempted Election Commission bribery case.

According to the charge sheet, the police are yet to established the money trail in the deal between Sukesh and AIADMK (Amma) faction leader T.T.V. Dhinakaran to get the ‘two leaves’ symbol for the latter’s faction.

After filing the charge sheet against Sukesh and three others at the Tis Hazari court, the police said it would file a supplementary charge sheet against Dhinakaran and the remaining accused after completing the probe against them. Earlier the police had said the deal was fixed for ₹50 lakh and a part of it had been paid to Sukesh.

Short on details

While the police had said in the 701-page report that analysis of conversations between the two aforementioned accused indicated that the money recovered from Sukesh was sent by Dhinakaran through unaccounted channels with the help of other accused persons, the details of the same are missing.

The list of 36 witnesses submitted in the chargesheet names two media executives working for private television channels, the Director of Rajya Sabha Secretariat and staff of the hotel from where Sukesh was arrested on April 16 besides Income Tax officials and policemen.

Interestingly, no ECI official has been named in the summary of investigations thus far, raising questions on whether any actual attempt was made by the accused to approach the institution with a bribe.

The charge sheet was filed by the Crime Branch of Delhi Police before Special Judge Manoj Jain, who listed the matter before the concerned judge on July 17 and issued a production warrant for Sukesh Chandrashekar for that day.

The charges against Chandrashekar include forgery of valuable security, forgery for purpose of cheating, using forged document as genuine and possessing a forged document, intending to use it as genuine, personating a public servant and criminal conspiracy.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.