Court notice to Centre, Delhi on Afzal Guru's plea to shift him

February 11, 2011 12:40 pm | Updated November 08, 2016 05:17 pm IST - New Delhi

In this file photograph dated 16 December 2002, Delhi Police escort Mohammed Afzal Guru (C) to court in New Delhi, 16 December 2002.  Indian lawmakers, 13 December 2006, were set to commemorate the fifth anniversary of a deadly attack on parliament as some citizens called for a retrial for Kashmiri Muslim, Mohammed Afzal Guru sentenced to death for his role in the plot.  The raid on parliament left 15 people dead, including the five attackers, and brought nuclear-armed India and Pakistan to the brink of war.  AFP PHOTO/Prakash SINGH/FILES

In this file photograph dated 16 December 2002, Delhi Police escort Mohammed Afzal Guru (C) to court in New Delhi, 16 December 2002. Indian lawmakers, 13 December 2006, were set to commemorate the fifth anniversary of a deadly attack on parliament as some citizens called for a retrial for Kashmiri Muslim, Mohammed Afzal Guru sentenced to death for his role in the plot. The raid on parliament left 15 people dead, including the five attackers, and brought nuclear-armed India and Pakistan to the brink of war. AFP PHOTO/Prakash SINGH/FILES

The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to the Centre and the Delhi government on a writ petition filed by Parliament attack case convict Afzal Guru seeking a direction to transfer him to a prison in Jammu and Kashmir from the Tihar jail in the capital.

A Bench of Justices Aftab Alam and R.M. Lodha, while issuing notice on the petition, asked Afzal Guru's counsel whether he could be shifted to any other place except Jammu and Kashmir. Counsel suggested that it would be better if he was shifted to Pathonkot jail in Punjab as it would be nearer to Jammu and Kashmir.

When the court wanted to know the status of the mercy petition, counsel said it was pending disposal for the last five years.

Petition

In his petition, filed through advocate Kamakshi Singh Mahilwal, Afzal, who has been sentenced to death in the December 2001 Parliament attack case, pleaded for shifting him to a prison in his home State as his family members were living there and that it was difficult for them to come over to Delhi to meet him.

Afzal also said that he had an 11-year-old son, and his mother, who was over 80 years found it difficult to come to Delhi to meet him.

He said it was not possible for his family to bear the cost of their travel to Delhi. He said the government should either transfer him to a Jammu and Kashmir jail or bear the cost of his family's travel to Delhi.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.