Court clears the way for Salem's trial in two cases

He will be tried for 1993 Mumbai blasts, Pradeep Jain murder

November 09, 2011 04:25 am | Updated November 17, 2021 02:45 am IST - Mumbai:

Bhopal: Underworld don Abu Salem comes out after a hearing at a Bhopal district court on Friday in connection with a fake passport case. PTI Photo (PTI11_19_2010_000206B)

Bhopal: Underworld don Abu Salem comes out after a hearing at a Bhopal district court on Friday in connection with a fake passport case. PTI Photo (PTI11_19_2010_000206B)

A designated Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) court on Tuesday rejected the application of gangster Abu Salem, pleading to stay proceedings against him after a Lisbon court revoked his extradition.

The court's order has cleared the way for Salem's trial in two cases here — the 1993 Mumbai blasts case and Pradeep Jain murder case.

“It can't be said at this stage that the decision of the court of authority, Lisbon, is final and it should be used to stay the proceedings. The termination of extradition has not yet attained finality. Its decision has been challenged [by the Indian authorities]. The matter is before the Supreme Court of Justice, Portugal. Since it has not attained finality, it will not be appropriate to stay the trial of the accused. The application made by the accused deserves to be rejected,” G. A. Sanap, special designated TADA judge, observed while passing the order here on Tuesday.

Salem had filed a plea in the court stating that “due to the breach of rule of speciality (by the Indian authorities), his extradition was terminated” by the Lisbon High Court. He had appealed that in view of termination of his extradition, the court should put a stay on the proceedings against him.

‘Rule of speciality' prohibits the prosecution from trying an extradited person for any other offence apart from the one for which he was extradited. Salem pleaded that the proceedings should continue only after there was a final decision on the extradition matter.

Supreme Court ruling

But the court did not agree with the plea. “The grievance made by the accused of breach of speciality has been turned down by the Supreme Court of India. This decision of the Supreme Court cannot be ignored,” Judge Sanap said.

He observed that if the proceedings on the termination of extradition end after two-three years, the court would be required to start the same proceedings against the accused all over again. “This, in my humble opinion, will be a criminal wastage of time.”

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), in its reply to Salem's application, stated that the proceedings against the accused can be halted only on the orders of the Government of India or on the instructions of the Supreme Court of India.

The court said that even if it was found in the future that there was a breach of the rule of speciality, Salem could be sent back at any stage of the trial. He was extradited from Portugal in 2005.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.