Clarify allegations of Ishrat’s terror links: Digvijay

‘Did Headley indeed tell NIA Ishrat had links with LeT?’

July 05, 2013 06:40 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 08:59 pm IST - New Delhi

Shimla : Congress General Secretary Digvijay Singh addresses the media in Shimla on Thursday. PTI Photo (PTI11_1_2012_000182A)

Shimla : Congress General Secretary Digvijay Singh addresses the media in Shimla on Thursday. PTI Photo (PTI11_1_2012_000182A)

Senior Congress leader Digvijay Singh on Friday asked Union Home Minister Sushilkumar Shinde to clarify the controversy over Ishrat Jahan’s alleged links with the Lashkar-e-Taiba. This follows the CBI charge sheet which says Ishrat Jahan was killed in a fake encounter in a joint operation carried out by the Gujarat police and the Intelligence Bureau (IB) nine years ago.

After meeting Mr. Shinde in the North Block, Mr. Singh said he told the Minister his Ministry should clarify as to whether David Headley, who had recceed the 26/11 targets for Mumbai terror attacks, had told investigators that Ishrat had links with the LeT, a Pakistan-based terrorist organisation. The Congress leaders also pointed to contradictory statements by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), the IB and the CBI in this connection.

“The NIA is saying something, the IB is saying [another thing] and the CBI something else. There should be clarity on what these government agencies are saying. Media sources [regarding news reports on Ishrat’s alleged terror links] should also be investigated… They are spreading panic in the nation,” Mr. Singh said.

Later, Mr. Shinde said he would verify reports which suggested that Headley had told the NIA that Ishrat had links with LeT. “Digvijay Singh has met [with me]. Let me look into the matter raised by him. Let me speak to agencies concerned,” the Minister later told journalists.

In 2010, the NIA had questioned Headley, who is lodged in a United States jail, as part of its investigation in the Mumbai terror attack case. According to media reports, NIA investigators initially said LeT commander Zaki-ur-Rahman Lakhvi told him Headleyin 2005 of a failed terror operation in India in which Ishrat and her accomplices had died. This information was reportedly in the NIA’s interrogation report of Headley given to the IB. However, this reference of Ishrat was later found missing from the NIA report. Sources said Headley’s comments were not legally admissible as they were based on second-hand information.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.