China may be giving a diplomatic message via tri-junction

Military officers say such standoffs are not unprecedented.

June 28, 2017 10:22 pm | Updated December 03, 2021 04:53 pm IST - NEW DELHI

Freezing ties:  A file photo of army soldiers  near the India-China trade route at Nathu-La,  north of Gangtok .

Freezing ties: A file photo of army soldiers near the India-China trade route at Nathu-La, north of Gangtok .

Army Chief General Bipin Rawat is expected to visit Sikkim to review the standoff between Indian and Chinese troops, even as military officers said such standoffs were not unprecedented.

Reliable sources said Indian troops objected to Chinese soldiers carrying out construction of a road stretch through the disputed Dolam Plateau (Donglang or Doklam), triggering the confrontation. In response, Chinese authorities denied entry to Kailash Mansarovar pilgrims via the Nathua La pass.

 

Former Army Chief Gen. Shankar Roychowdhury told The Hindu that such incidents were not new and they date back to 1967 when the first such clash took place at Nathu La between troops of the two nations.

“This is a flashpoint. These take place from time to time,” he said. However, he pointed out, the question is why such incidents are taking place in such frequency. “Is it because our Prime Minister is perceived to be too close to the U.S. or is it to assist its best ally Pakistan? Or is it a combination of all these factors plus history. Add to that is the fact they have turned the pilgrims away.”

‘Keeping India engaged’

A recently retired Army officer, who has served on the Sikkim border with China, said he too believed that the timing of the Chinese action, not just in provoking a border standoff but to send back Kailash Mansarovar yatra pilgrims, was a diplomatic message to coincide with Mr. Modi’s U.S. visit.

Brigadier Gurmeet Kanwal, Distinguished Fellow, Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, said these incidents were a continuum of maintaining stability at a strategic level while “keeping India engaged at the tactical level through political, diplomatic and military means.” He said the standoff would take sometime but would be resolved.

 

“It could be said to be Chinese manifestation of the choices India has made in the recent past,” he said in the context of the recent disputes between the two countries and the timing of the incident.

Sources in the Army said the standoff at the India-China-Bhutan tri-junction was not unprecedented.

One officer who had served there said, “It is almost an annual affair.”

“The Chinese believe that the Dolam Plateau belongs to them, and have been constructing a road through the disputed area to Bhutan for a long time,” he pointed out.

And the standoff must also be seen against recent diplomatic unease between the two sides, including India’s stand on the Belt and Road Initiative.

 

Border on the boil

There were repeated skirmishes on the India-China border ever since the 1962 war.

 

September 1967: Chinese troops fired at Indian posts close to Nathu La and the Indian Army retaliated with full force. Both sides suffered casualties with China significantly higher. A ceasefire was declared later.

 

June 1986: The Indian Army launched exercise ''Chequerboard'' after China amassed thousands of troops in the Thandrong pasture on the banks of the Somdurong Chu river. The situation was diffused diplomatically by August 1987.

 

November 2008: Chinese troops destroyed makeshift Indian Army bunkers at Doko La near the Sikkim-Bhutan-Tibet tri-junction.

 

April 2013: Chinese troops intruded into Daulat Beg Oldi in Eastern Ladakh and set up camps in the Depsang Valley. These came ahead of Premier Li Keqiang’s India visit.

 

August 2014: Chinese troops entered 25 to 30 km into the Indian territory in Burtse area in Ladakh and pitched their tents and the standoff continued for three weeks.

 

September 2014:   About 1,000  troops intruded 3 km inside Chumar in Eastern Ladakh. The incident lasted for a week and coincided with Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to India.

 

March 2016: A platoon of chinese soldiers came about 5.5 km inside the Indian territory near Pangong Tso lake in Eastern Ladakh. Incident resolved in a few hours.

 

June 2017: China removed an old bunker of the Indian Army located at the tri-junction of India, China and Bhutan in Sikkim by using a bulldozer after the Indian side refused to accede to its request to dismantle it.

 

Beijing's stance

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lu Kang touched upon following issues while addressing the media in Beijing:

Donglang's status

'Donglang is part of China’s territory. This is indisputable. The Donglang area belonged to China since ancient times and it doesn’t belong to Bhutan'

Road project

'Chinese construction of the road project is legitimate and normal action on its territory. No other country has the right to interfere'

Kailash-Mansarovar yatra

''The suspension of the same is an emergency response to the situation there. I want to stress that the resumption of pilgrims pass requires necessary atmosphere and conditions'

Bhutan's sovereignty

'If any third party, out of hidden agenda, interferes it is disrespect of the sovereignty of Bhutan. We don’t want to see this as Bhutan is a country entitled to sovereignty by the international community'

Pakistan's efforts

'China thinks that the international cooperation against terrorism should be enhanced and stepped up. The international community should give full recognition and affirmation to Pakistan’s efforts in this regard'

 

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.