The Board advises the Central government on policy matters relating to use of pre-natal diagnostic techniques, sex selection techniques and against their misuse
Concerned over the sharp decline in the child sex ratio as reflected in the provisional Census figures, the Centre on Saturday reconstituted the Central Supervisory Board set up under the Pre-conception & Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994 (PC & PNDT Act).
Chaired by the Union Minister for Health and Family Welfare and co-chaired by the Minister of Women and Child Development, the Board consists of ex-officio members; 10 non official members — two each from five categories of medical geneticists, gynaecologists and obstetricians, paediatricians, social scientists and representatives of women welfare organisations; three women Members of Parliament (two from the Lok Sabha and one from the Rajya Sabha); four members to be appointed by the Centre by rotation to represent the States and the Union Territories.
The new Board will have 35 members including Ghulam Nabi Azad, Union Minister of Health & Family Welfare as the chairperson; Krishna Tirath, Minister of State (Women & Child Development) as Co-Chair; K. Chandramouli, Union Health and Family Welfare Secretary; R.K. Srivastava, Director-General, Health Services; joint secretary & legal adviser, Ministry of Law & Justice; Adviser (Ayurveda), Department of AYUSH, and joint secretary (PNDT) as the member-secretary.
Review meet
The first meeting of the reconstituted Board is likely to be held in the last week of May. Prior to that, a review meeting of State Health Secretaries has been scheduled for April 20 for an in-depth review of the implementation of the PC & PNDT Act and to chalk out a concerted action plan to check the practice of sex selection leading to female foeticide.
The non-official members include representatives from non-governmental organisations working in the field of women's health, gynaecologists and obstetricians, social scientists, paediatricians, and health experts. The three women MPs on the Board will be Prabha Kishore Taviad, Poonamben Veljibhai Jat and Mabel Rebello.
Special invitees
Special invitees will be representatives of the Indian Radiological & Imaging Association; the Indian Medical Association; State governments; Brinda Karat, MP; member-secretary of the National Commission for Women; Neelam Singh, advocate, Supreme Court of India, and UNFPA Representative in India.
The Board advises the Centre on policy matters relating to use of pre-natal diagnostic techniques, sex-selection techniques and against their misuse; review and monitor implementation of the Act and rules made under it and recommend to the Union government changes in the said Act and rules. It also helps to create public awareness against the practice of pre-conception sex selection and pre-natal determination of sex of foetus; lays down code of conduct to be observed by persons working at genetic counselling centres, laboratories and clinics; and oversees the performance of various bodies constituted under the Act and take appropriate steps to ensure its proper and effective implementation.
More comprehensive
In order to check female foeticide, the Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994 was brought into operation from January 1, 1996. The Act was amended to make it more comprehensive and was renamed “Pre-conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994.” The main objective of the Act is to ban the use of sex selection techniques before or after conception as well as misuse of pre-natal diagnostic techniques for sex-selective abortions and to regulate such techniques, so as to pre-empt the misuse of such technologies and consequent adverse impact on the sex ratio.
Keywords: Child sex ratio, PNDT board, Ghulam Nabi Azad








I was married on 28th November 2004, but said marriage has gone to rocks on account of harassment and tortures meted out to me which were accentuated due to philosophy of life and bias against getting female children for which the entire family of my in laws were not prepared and birth of daughters was abhorrent for them. When I conceived and the pregnancy was confirmed on 5.2.2005, I was deceitfully subjected to ultrasound primarily with a view to get the sex of the fetus determined which I was resisting and not agreeing for the same.
By deceit I was made to eat a cake laced with eggs when it was known to the doctor husband and in-laws family that I was allergic to egg and consequently I started vomiting with acute abdominal pain, on which as per the conspiracy of the in laws, I was taken to their chosen hospital without referring my regular gynecologist under whom I was getting my regular ante-natal check up done. There I was subjected to K.U.B (Kidney, ureter, Bladder) ultrasound which was not essential. On the pretext of conducting the K.U.B ultrasound I was subjected to full fetal scan, without my knowledge and consent.
There are mandatory and specific provisions under the P.C-P.N.D.T act which are required to be followed in every hospital/nursing home before performing an ultrasound on a pregnant woman, which also requires that a consent shall be obtained for conducting the fetal ultrasound and also the said hospital is required to maintain all records pertaining to the ultrasound in Form F and transmit to the District Appropriate Authority every month the said record of the Form F with regard to the said fetal ultrasounds which in the present case is shockingly and apparently missing as a result of manipulation to defeat the law.
A complaint was filed by me to the C.D.M.O / District Appropriate Authority, North West but no proper inquiry was conducted by the said Authority and for that reason the I had filed a separate complaint under section 200 CrPC against Hospital and five other persons under the P.C-P.N.D.T act which is pending before the concerned Metropolitan Magistrate. The Appropriate Authority under the act, though compelled to file a complaint which under the P.C-P.N.D.T act is determined to cause miscarriage of justice and defeat the law under the powerful influential guilty perpetrators of crime and defeat the objective of social legislation i.e. P.C-P.N.D.T act.
It was found very early in the investigations that no form F was filed, when fetal ultrasound was done on me, my name was not there in the monthly records sent to the appropriate authorities and also that no gynecologist had asked for a fetal scan, but had asked for a scan of my Kidneys , ureter and bladder, and still the fetal scan was done. Despite all this evidences the appropriate authorities had given an inquiry report that there is no direct/circumstantial evidence of sex determination. Despite repeated appeals by me against this inquiry committee report, no action was taken to undo the damage. Appropriate authority after an fake and cursory inquiry, opined that the acts of the Dr and Hospital Authorities ( not filling form F and not maintaining the requisite records) are procedural lapse and not an offense under the act despite the Authoritative pronouncement of Full Bench Of Gujarat High Court.
Despite all evidences the appropriate authority has left no stone unturned to favor the accused and harass me to withdraw my complaint. Therefore it not surprising that no woman dares to come out and file a complaint against the doctor who did the sex determination tests.
The reconstitution of the supervisory board is mostly old wine in a new bottle accompanied by the usual cliches.Only a systematic and methodical policy of comprehensive and consistent empowerment of our women will address this gender gap effectively.Committees have rarely solved problems meaningfully because of poor follow-up action.
Please Email the Editor