CEC “disappointed” over non-tabling of electoral reforms bill

December 30, 2011 04:43 pm | Updated November 07, 2016 08:30 pm IST - New Delhi

Election commisioner india  Dr,Sy, Qureshi, adressing a press conference in srinagar on 01, May, 2009,

Election commisioner india Dr,Sy, Qureshi, adressing a press conference in srinagar on 01, May, 2009,

Government has made significant changes in the proposal to debar criminal candidates from contesting elections and other issues, says Chief Election Commissioner S.Y. Quraishi.

Expressing “disappointment” over the delay in bringing important legislations on electoral reforms and not passing them in the winter session, he hopes Parliament will make a beginning at least in the Budget session.

“We are disappointed that this (electoral reforms) did not happen in the winter session while 30-40 bills came and our bill did not come.

“The only benefit of doubt that needs to be given is that the government was kept busy with the Lokpal round the clock. I hope at least in the budget session the government keeps its promise and brings up this bill,” Mr. Quraishi told PTI in an interview.

He said Law Minister Salman Khurshid came to the Commission a third time and gave an assurance that the government will bring major reforms in the winter session that included proposals to debar criminals and transparency of political funding.

“And he asked us whether we are ok if other issues can be taken up later. We said yes that these issues are the most important and crucial. We will be happy if these are brought up. He has some modifications to our proposals and we are ok with those also,” he said.

Modifying the Commission’s proposals, government has raised the period from six months to one year the chargesheet filed against a candidate for heinous offences to bar them from contesting.

“Our formulation and also that of the Law Commission, which consists of jurists, has been that at least in those cases which are of heinous nature, not petty law and order agitations but of heinous offences like rape, murder, dacoity, kidnapping, etc., where the FIR has been registered six months before the election and court has framed the charges, the candidates can be barred.

“The court is an independent and judicial body and framing of charges is done with judicial application of mind even if prima facie at that stage. At least in those cases they should be barred,” the Commission had suggested.

On government’s modification, he said, “We said no problem. Then they said instead of six months or one year from FIR, if it is one year from the chargesheet. We said no problem but please make a beginning. But we are hoping that in the budget session it will come.”

He said the government has been saying that political consensus has been difficult on debarring criminals, which is also obvious because every party has its share of such candidates.

“And they say that false cases in politics by their rivals is a common practice. So it will be unfair to debar them on the basis of a possible false complaint.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.