Today's Paper Archive Classifieds Subscriptions RSS Feeds Site Map ePaper Mobile Apps Social

News » National

Updated: May 13, 2011 01:50 IST

CBI will move Bhopal sessions court for early hearing

Smita Gupta
Share  ·   Comment (1)   ·   print   ·  
Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram addresses the media in New Delhi on Thursday. Photo: S. Subramanium
The Hindu Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram addresses the media in New Delhi on Thursday. Photo: S. Subramanium

A day after the Supreme Court rejected its curative petitions, the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government said it would ask the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to move the sessions court in Bhopal for an early hearing of its revision application and appeal filed by the Madhya Pradesh government to seek graver punishment for the accused in the Bhopal gas tragedy case.

“This is not the end of the road,” stressed Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram as he addressed the first briefing organised by the new Group of Ministers (GoM) on the media here on Thursday.

Clearly not discouraged by the court's rejection of the curative petitions, filed last year after the Group of Ministers (GoM) on the Bhopal case decided that legal steps be taken to punish the accused for graver charges under the law, Mr. Chidambaram said the CBI's revision application and the appeal filed by the Madhya Pradesh government in the sessions court in Bhopal to try the accused for graver charges under the Indian Penal Code (IPC) should be pursued vigorously.

In support of this line of action, he underscored the fact that the Supreme Court had, in its judgment of Wednesday, observed that “the criminal revisions filed by the CBI and Madhya Pradesh the legal position are correctly stated.”

Referring to the GoM on the Bhopal case, the Minister said the curative petitions had been filed in the Supreme Court on the basis of Attorney-General G.E. Vahanvati's advice that there was “sufficient ground” to do so.

Asked why the government had taken so long to file the curative petitions, he said that when a review petition was filed on behalf of certain affected parties against the Supreme Court's judgment of 1996, it was dismissed. At that time there was no scope for filing a curative petition because the law relating to curative petitions was laid down much later in 2002.

UPA alone not responsible

However, while acknowledging that the public outcry last year against the paltry punishment given to the accused pushed the government to file the curative petitions against the 1996 judgment, Mr. Chidambaram said the UPA government could not be singled out as responsible for the delay. He said that since 1996, several governments, representing virtually all major political parties, had ruled at the Centre. “In a sense, therefore, “all governments since 1996 are responsible for the delay in moving the Supreme Court.”

What a farce is this? What does this man PC think? Does he think all people in this country are fools and this Congress party can keep cheating the public? This is the same party which let out Anderson without arresting him and showed utter disregard for bringing him back for justice. Anderson is the man to have been punished first and he is scot free. But just for appeasing the people affected , Indian businessmen are being punished? I don't say they should be spared. But I say that Anderson must also be punished and that too must get the highest punishment.

from:  G.Chandrasekaran
Posted on: May 13, 2011 at 06:10 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor


Andhra Pradesh


Tamil Nadu

The HIndu's in-depth coverage of agriculture
The HIndu's in-depth coverage of news and opinion on Aadhar and direct benefit transfers



Recent Article in National

File photo shows cell phone towers in Chennai. The Supreme Court has held that the Comptroller and Auditor-General of India can audit the accounts of private telecom companies which share revenue with the government for using spectrum.

CAG can audit private telcos: Supreme Court

Upholds January 6, 2014 Delhi High Court ruling that it was the duty of the CAG to audit telecom companies as a part of their revenue goes to the Consolidated Fund of India. »