SEARCH

News » National

Updated: October 22, 2011 01:45 IST

CBI director against bifurcation of agency

Special Correspondent
Comment (2)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
Amar Pratap Singh, Director,Central Bureau of Investigation. File photo: S. Subramanium
Amar Pratap Singh, Director,Central Bureau of Investigation. File photo: S. Subramanium

Central Bureau of Investigation Director Amar Pratap Singh on Friday came out strongly against any proposal to bifurcate the agency or divest it of its anti-corruption mandate.

In his welcome address at the inauguration of the 18th Biennial Conference of Heads of State Anti-Corruption Bureaux and the CBI at Vigyan Bhavan here, Mr. Singh said: “One of the draft bills for the Lokpal envisages merger of the anti-corruption wing of the CBI with the Lokpal. Given the composite nature of the CBI, which is its intrinsic strength, I am of the firm belief that such a proposal is neither practical nor advisable.”

Acknowledging that recent cases such as 2G and CWG and the subsequent introduction of the Lokpal Bill in Parliament have initiated a national debate on corruption, the CBI chief said it was the “opportune moment” to strengthen and functionally empower the existing anti-corruption agencies to realise their full potential.

Mr. Singh said in any effort to strengthen the mechanism to combat corruption, the CBI must be an integral and independent component.

He expressed his views frankly in the presence of Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, Home Minister P. Chidambaram, Law Minister Salman Khursheed, and Minister of State for Personnel V. Narayansamy.

The two-day conference with its theme “Corruption: Emerging Challenges and Responses” is being hosted by the CBI.

Earlier, Mr. Singh put forth the CBI's views in a presentation before the Parliamentary Standing Committee, headed by Congress Rajya Sabha member Abhishek Manu Singhvi, that was looking into different versions of the Lokpal Bill.

In the agency's view, both the civil society's Jan Lokpal and government's version appear to be “unworkable” and would weaken the enforcement of the anti-corruption regime in the country. On the proposals in the Jan Lokpal Bill, the CBI contended that it was a “composite organisation” and to treat its Anti-Corruption Wing as “severable” would be counter-productive.

Pointing out that the menace of corruption cannot be tackled through anti-corruption agencies alone, Mr. Singh said a multi-dimensional approach was required. He said the agencies faced major impediments.

“Section 6 (A) of Delhi Special Police Establishment [DSPE] Act, 1946 does not allow the CBI to conduct an enquiry or investigation into offences committed by an officer of the rank of Joint Secretary or above, without the prior permission of the government. There are also delays in getting sanction for prosecution, execution of Letters Rogatory and requests for investigation of offences committed abroad. Another major impediment is the delays in trial of cases. The CBI alone has 10,000 cases pending trial,” he said.

Mr. Singh said corruption at the grassroots, mostly affecting the lives of the average citizen, was a result of an imbalance in the demand and supply of goods.

“We have seen that with the improvement in service, delivery in certain sectors such as telecom, aviation and gas connections for households, opportunities for indulging in corrupt practices have greatly reduced. This shows that if we are able to cater to the daily needs of our citizens and also minimise their interface with the bureaucracy, we could insulate them to a large extent from the phenomenon of corruption.”

More In: National | News

If you leave the option to any agency, it will like to be its own boss and not controlled by any body else. CBI is no exception from this rule. They have never questioned the ruling party knowing fully well where corruption lies or who is giving wrong orders. This agency has not earned the name to be heard as an independent agency and one can not rely on their opinion. Their opinion will rightfully be looked upon as guided by some body else because that is what they have been doing all their life span. JLPB must be made and they should be told what is their new role and there is no reason to seek their advise.

from:  jonejaop
Posted on: Oct 21, 2011 at 17:55 IST

The above lines left me with a feeling that, the CBI director is only pandering to his Government bosses tastes.
1.`"This shows that if we are able to cater to the daily needs of our citizens and also minimise their interface with the bureaucracy, we could insulate them to a large extent from the phenomenon of corruption" Mr. Singh said.`
Doesn't this only suggest a way out for the gov to keep the common man insulated from low level corruption & continue to suck the country's wealth and health through corruption at higher places.
2."Section 6 (A) of DSPE Act, 1946 does not allow CBI to conduct an enquiry or investigation into offences committed by an officer of the rank of Joint Secretary and above without the prior permission of the Government."
What about the scores of corruption cases and genuine allegations against lower ranking officers of the bureaucracy, politicians and government officials? What prevents CBI from doing timely investigations and bring out the truth?

from:  Anurag
Posted on: Oct 21, 2011 at 16:09 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor
The Hindu presents the all-new Young World

In the 16th Lok Sabha Election 2014, West Bengal has witnessed some interesting trends. Apart from the debacle of the Left and the ascendance of the Trinamool Congress (AITC), the other somewhat s... »

International

Tamil Nadu

Andhra Pradesh

Karnataka

Kerala


O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in National

Jawahar Sircar. File Photo: R. Ravindran

Kisan TV: ideas sought on Twitter

Taking a cue from Union Minister of State for Information and Broadcasting Prakash Javadekar’s decision to “crowd-source” government adv... »