CAG pulls up HRD Ministry over Aakash project

September 06, 2013 05:03 pm | Updated December 04, 2021 11:39 pm IST - New Delhi

The Comptroller and Auditor-General of India on Friday slammed the HRD Ministry for the shortcomings in the Aakash tablet project. File photo

The Comptroller and Auditor-General of India on Friday slammed the HRD Ministry for the shortcomings in the Aakash tablet project. File photo

The CAG on Friday slammed the HRD Ministry for the shortcomings in the Aakash tablet project, raising questions over “arbitrary” selection of IIT-Rajasthan to launch the scheme without carrying out an assessment of its capacity to undertake the work.

In its report tabled in Parliament, the government auditor observed that IIT-Rajasthan had told the Ministry that around 90 per cent of the tablets supplied by Datawind between August and November 2011 were rejected by it due to complaints in the devices such as heating and they being slow.

“The Ministry decided to launch Aakash through the IIT-Rajasthan without ascertaining their capacity to undertake the work. This adversely affected the project delivery. It also placed Rs. 47.42 crore at IITR’s disposal without carrying out a prudent assessment,” it said.

“This raises issues of financial propriety. This adversely affected the project delivery along with an avoidable expenditure of Rs. 1.05 crore,” the report said.

Under the Akash tablet project, the government has plans of distributing the low-cost access-cum-computing device at a cost of Rs. 1,500 to students and teachers for educational purposes.

The CAG said documents suggest that the Ministry did not provide any justification for selecting IIT-Rajathan to execute the order and thus its selection was arbitrary.

“The audit view is further borne out by the fact that IIT(s) Kanpur, Kharagpur, Madras, Bombay and IISC, Bangalore had participated. However, they were overlooked and a relatively new IITR was selected ahead of others,” it said.

CAG said IIT-Rajasthan was awarded the project when it was operating from a temporary premises but the “important observation of the Finance Division was ignored.”

This article has been corrected for an editing error.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.