CAG appointment mala fide, says plea

A vacation Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Dipak Misra on Thursday directed that the petition by advocate Manoharlal Sharma be listed for hearing on July 1, when the court reopens after summer vacation.

May 24, 2013 12:24 am | Updated November 16, 2021 08:23 pm IST - New Delhi:

Sashi Kant Sharma taking charge as new Comptroller & Auditor-General of India (CAG) in New Delhi on Thursday. Photo: Shanker Chakravarty

Sashi Kant Sharma taking charge as new Comptroller & Auditor-General of India (CAG) in New Delhi on Thursday. Photo: Shanker Chakravarty

The appointment of the former Defence Secretary, Sashi Kant Sharma, as the 12th Comptroller and Auditor-General of India has been challenged in a public interest writ petition in the Supreme Court.

A vacation Bench of Justices B.S. Chauhan and Dipak Misra on Thursday directed that the petition by advocate Manoharlal Sharma be listed for hearing on July 1, when the court reopens after summer vacation.

Mr. M.L. Sharma, who made a mention for early hearing, alleged that the selection of Vinod Rai’s successor was shrouded in secrecy. “None of the parliamentarians/political parties has been consulted.” The petitioner alleged that Mr. Sashi Kant Sharma, a 1976 batch Bihar cadre officer, had worked in the Defence Ministry for almost 10 years when all-important defence acquisitions were made. It was during his tenure the defence budget was increased from around Rs 25,000 crore to more than Rs. 2 lakh crore and it was still under CAG audit.

The AgustaWestland chopper deal, being investigated by the CBI over allegations of payment of kickbacks to many people in order to have the contract approved, had been prepared and finalised by Mr. Sashi Kant Sharma along with the Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister, the petitioner said, adding an interested person could not be appointed auditor to audit his own accounts report, work and performance during his previous tenure. Various other multibillion defence deals were also pending CAG audit.

Thus the Centre’s appointment was a mala fide and arbitrary exercise of power to justify its “financial manipulations” pending before the CAG for auditing, he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.