Bombay High Court rejects Abu Jundal’s plea to appear in courts

April 29, 2014 06:39 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 04:27 am IST - Mumbai

In this July 5, 2012 security officers escort Sayed Zabiuddin Ansari, who also uses alias Abu Jundal, to a court in New Delhi.

In this July 5, 2012 security officers escort Sayed Zabiuddin Ansari, who also uses alias Abu Jundal, to a court in New Delhi.

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday rejected the plea of Sayyed Zabiuddin Ansari alias Abu Jundal, prime accused in 26/11 Mumbai terror attack case, to quash a Maharashtra Government Resolution (GR) which prohibited him from appearing in the courts as he had threat to his life.

Jundal’s lawyer Ejaz Naqvi prayed that his client had a right under the Constitution to appear before the courts in cases filed against him because he had to defend himself.

A bench of Justices N.H. Patil and Anujha Prabhudessai said that there were many criminal cases pending against Jundal, such as 26/11 terror attack case, Aurangabad arms haul case and conspiracy to attack police training camp in Nasik.

“In view of the sensitive nature of the cases, there may be danger to Jundal’s life as informed by police to the state and therefore the court cannot interfere by quashing the GR of the government. Moreover, the trial court had the powers to call him whenever necessary,” said the bench.

Government pleader J.P. Yagnik said the Mumbai Police Commissioner had informed the state that Jundal had threat to his life. Thereafter, on May 23, 2013, the government came out with a GR imposing a ban on his appearance in cases in which he is an accused.

“If Jundal was allowed to come to the court and some thing happens to him, then who would be responsible for this?” he asked.

Mr. Yagnik said that Jundal could be produced before the court through the medium of video conference and his physical appearance was not necessary.

Jundal’s lawyer argued that the impugned GR was contrary to fundamental right of public hearing and a free and fair trial of the Constitution. Hence, it was void, vague, unconstitutional and arbitrary.

Jundal, facing charges of participating in the conspiracy in 26/11 terror attack case, is currently lodged in solitary confinement in Central Jail at Arthur Road in Central Mumbai, since February 2013.

According to police, Jundal had gone to Pakistan to train the terrorists in speaking Hindi. Ten terrorists, who arrived in Mumbai via sea route on November 26, 2008, killed 166 persons and injured many others by firing indiscriminately in public places.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.