BJP takes exception to Chidambaram's appointment

It's a clear case of conflict of interest, the party says

July 07, 2012 04:09 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 11:28 pm IST - New Delhi

Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram

Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram

The Bharatiya Janata Party has taken exception to the appointment of Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram as the head of the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) on spectrum and allied issues. This exposed Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s claim that he had maintained high standards of integrity in his conduct, it said.

In a statement, BJP chief spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said Dr. Singh had once again confirmed that constitutional propriety, parliamentary accountability and probity in governance were unimportant and irrelevant to him.

Mr. Prasad listed six ‘reasons’ which, according to him, disqualify Mr. Chidambaram from even being a member of the EGoM, leave alone presiding over it. It was very much in the public domain that 2G spectrum pricing was determined by the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, in consultation with the then Finance Minister, Mr. Chidambaram, which was subsequently accepted by the Prime Minister, a fact confirmed by him in Parliament.

Mr. Prasad said a case pleading to make Mr. Chidambaram a co-accused in the 2G trial was pending and several people named in the case, including Mr. Raja, had been urging the court to summon Mr. Chidambaram.

He maintained that Mr. Chidambaram granted approval to companies like Swan and Unitech, which were on trial in the case, to sell their shares at a higher premium cost after they benefited from spectrum allocation at 2001 rates.

Mr. Prasad said that in the Maxis-Aircel deal, now being investigated by the CBI, “disturbing” questions were raised about the role of people close to Mr. Chidambaram’s family.

“In the light of above glaring facts, the appointment of Mr. Chidambaram not only gives a very wrong message but it is also a clear case of conflict of interest. This once again confirms that whenever cases of massive corruption came, Dr. Singh looked the other way instead of taking action,” he said.

In politics and governance, perception and propriety were very important and by appointing Mr. Chidambaram as the head of the EGoM on spectrum, the Prime Minister had arrogantly sought to convey that he was not much concerned about it, Mr. Prasad said.

The Bharatiya Janata Party has taken exception to the appointment of Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram as the head of the Empowered Group of Ministers (EGoM) on spectrum and allied issues. This exposed Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s claim that he had maintained high standard of integrity in his conduct, it said.

In a statement, BJP chief spokesperson Ravi Shankar Prasad said Dr. Singh had once again confirmed that constitutional propriety, parliamentary accountability and probity in governance were unimportant and irrelevant to him.

Mr. Prasad listed six ‘reasons’ which, according to him, disqualify Mr. Chidambaram from even being a member of the EGoM, leave alone presiding over it. It was very much in public domain that 2G spectrum pricing was determined by the former Telecom Minister, A. Raja, in consultation with the then Finance Minister, Mr. Chidambaram, which was subsequently accepted by the Prime Minister, a fact confirmed by him in Parliament.

Mr. Prasad said the case pleading to make Mr. Chidambaram a co-accused in the 2G trial was pending and several people named in the case, including Mr. Raja, have been urging the court to summon Mr. Chidambaram. He maintained that Mr. Chidambaram had granted approval to companies like Swan and Unitech, which were on trial in the case, to sell their shares at a higher premium cost after they benefited from spectrum allocation at 2001 rates.

Mr. Prasad said that in the Maxis-Aircel deal, now being investigated by the CBI, “disturbing” questions have been raised about the role of people close to Mr. Chidambaram’s family.

“In the light of above glaring facts, the reported appointment of Mr. Chidambaram not only gives a very wrong message but it is also a clear case of conflict of interest. This once again confirms that whenever cases of massive corruption came, Dr. Singh looked the other way instead of taking action,” he said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.