BJP questions Chidambaram’s absence during budget debate

“It is the most important financial obligation of the Finance Minister. Where is he?”

March 19, 2013 12:52 am | Updated 01:56 am IST - NEW DELHI:

The Opposition Bhartiya Janata Party protested the absence of Union Finance Minister P. Chidambaram in the Rajya Sabha during the discussion on the Union Budget on Monday.

BJP members were on their feet soon after Minister of State for Finance Namo Narain Meena rose to move three Appropriation Bills for consideration in the absence of Mr. Chidambaram, against whose name they were listed.

“This is an insult to the House,” said BJP member M. Venkaiah Naidu, who was to initiate the discussion. “The Minister is expected to be present.” He wanted to know whether Mr. Chidambaram had taken permission of the House to be absent.

He was joined by Ravi Shankar Prasad (BJP). “The Budget discussion is going to start,” he said. “It is the most important financial obligation of the Finance Minister. Where is he?”

Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs Rajiv Shukla intervened to say that Mr. Chidambaram had to leave for Chennai. Finance Ministers had been absent and their deputies had substituted for them even during the time of the National Democratic Alliance, he said.

E.M.S. Natchiappan, who was in the Chair, said the Minister had written to the Chairman who had approved his absence during the discussion on the general Budget.

Mr. Naidu objected to this and said it was a “sad commentary” on the way the ruling party was dealing with Parliament. “It is not a question of the Chair, but the respect shown by the Minister to the House. He was here and then he went when the Budget discussion was to take place, lowering the dignity of the House.”

When Tiruchi Siva (DMK) tried to speak in defence of the Minister, Mr. Naidu objected. “Please do not defend the indefensible,’’ he told him.

Just then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, who is also the leader of the House, walked in and took his seat. Mr. Naidu said he appreciated the Prime Minister’s presence in the House, but the person responsible for the Budget was absent and this went against the Parliamentary system.

It is an insult to the House, says Venkaiah Naidu

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.