SEARCH

News » National

Updated: August 23, 2010 01:13 IST

BJP, Left to push for nuclear bill changes in House

Neena Vyas
Comment (4)   ·   print   ·   T  T  
A dummy fuel assembly being loaded in the first reactor of Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project. It seems the issue may be resolved, if at all, during the discussion on the bill when it is taken up for consideration and passing in the Lok Sabha. The bill is now the property of the House. File Photo: A.Shaikmohideen
The Hindu
A dummy fuel assembly being loaded in the first reactor of Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project. It seems the issue may be resolved, if at all, during the discussion on the bill when it is taken up for consideration and passing in the Lok Sabha. The bill is now the property of the House. File Photo: A.Shaikmohideen

Left to oppose legislation on civil nuclear liability; CPI(M) gives dissent note

With no fresh contact on the Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage Bill between the government and the Bharatiya Janata Party — or for that matter any other Opposition party — it seems the issue may be resolved, if at all, during the discussion on the bill when it is taken up for consideration and passing in the Lok Sabha. The bill is now the property of the House.

While the BJP said “it appears there is a deviation from the text that was agreed,” the Left made it clear that it would oppose the bill. The Communist Party of India (Marxist) did not agree with the text as approved by the BJP and other parties represented on the Standing Committee that considered the bill over the past three months. It had given a dissent note; and there was no question of it supporting the bill with further dilution of supplier liability. The changes in respect of supplier liability were “irrational and ridiculous,” D. Raja of the CPI said.

The Left party leaders also said the government seemed to have learnt no lessons from what happened after the deadly Bhopal gas leak.

S.S. Ahluwalia, a BJP member of the Standing Committee, was categorical that now whatever needed to be done had to be done on the floor of the House, not behind closed doors. “The bill is now the property of the House. Whatever changes are made now after the bill, with its proposed amendments, has been circulated to MPs, will have to be done during the course of the discussion on the bill. The government can move an amendment, the BJP may do so or any other party MP is free to move an amendment on the floor of the House…”

Minister of State in the Prime Minister's Office Prithviraj Chavan confirmed to The Hindu that there was no contact with the Opposition leaders on Sunday. “We will be contacting them,” he said. For, well before the bill is taken up, the government will again try to hammer out an agreement with the BJP on any fresh amendment that may be worked out.

Since Monday and Tuesday are not working days in Parliament — there are no sittings on account of Onam and Rakshabandhan holidays — the earliest the fracas over the exact words to be used to pin supplier liability can only be Wednesday. At least two of the key players from the BJP — Yashwant Sinha and Sushma Swaraj — were both away in their constituencies, while Arun Jaitley told PTI: “We are examining all the papers. Prima facie, it appears there is a deviation from the text, which was agreed upon. The language as framed now substantially nullifies supplier liability.” He confirmed that there was no contact between the government and the BJP.

This was on Sunday, a day after the text of the bill, as approved by the Cabinet, began to be circulated among MPs Immediately there were protests, the strongest from the Left parties, that by introducing “intent to cause nuclear damage” as a condition for suppliers' liability, the government was again trying to let nuclear suppliers get away with almost no liability.

Open to concerns, says Congress

PTI reports:

The Congress said on Sunday that the government was open to take Opposition concerns onboard to build the widest possible consensus on the matter.

Congress spokesman Manish Tewari termed the bill as “work in progress” and said the government had always been open to address the legitimate concerns on the draft legislation.

“It (bill) is a work in progress and I think if at all there are any legitimate concerns, the government has always been open and would be open to taking those concerns onboard because that is what is the essence of any Parliamentary democracy.” However, he made a distinction between criminal and civil liability and said that the Bill in question dealt with “strict civil liability.”

More In: National | News


When in the US and other developed countries, the liability is absolute and not based on fault, why in India, there should be conditions which can never be proved in Indian courts as the bench marks for fixing liability.

In those countries, since the liability for any damage to public being regardless of any fault but criteria is only proof of damage arising out of use of nuclear energy, there are stipulations that adequate insurance coverage are to be obtained before involving in any such activity.

Why the Indian's life or right is considered value less. The same conditions applicable to those countries could certainly be made applicable to India also. Default in such insurance coverage and the safety standards should also be made punishable with prescribed punishments without discretion to reductions. This would make those involved in it careful.

from:  Sreelal Warriar
Posted on: Aug 24, 2010 at 10:33 IST

Even in the Bhopal gas tragedy the government at that time was influenced by the American company. Inspite of pleadings by Ameerican lawyers to engage them to win good compensation to the victims, the government used only local lawyers and did not try to protect the interests of the victims evidently influenced by the foreign company. We know how the government protected Anderson from facing the law.
Clearly we cannot trust the present government to take care of Indians against the interests of the Bhopal gas factory owners. It is time a no confidence motion aagainst the government is moved by the opposition and public protests are started asking the government to quit.

from:  k.k.kuruvilla
Posted on: Aug 24, 2010 at 01:03 IST

We don’t want another Bhopal disaster to happen.The liability bill should ensure both the Indian government and its citizen will be protected and who ever is responsible in any kind of disaster is held accountable and the victims will be compensated without any complication . A strong liability bill will always protect India and its citizens.

from:  Sabeer
Posted on: Aug 23, 2010 at 19:35 IST

Dear Sir, It is really amazing that the bill in its present form has seen so much progress, given the gravity of the matter. As mentioned, India must not, at any cost, forget and overlook the shocking and criminal Bhopal incident. I do not see why the bill has to be almost pampering to the suppliers?

from:  Prof. Susanta Sarkar
Posted on: Aug 23, 2010 at 02:14 IST
This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Avian Influenza Outbreak

More Avian Influenza Outbreak »

International

Tamil Nadu

Andhra Pradesh

Karnataka

Kerala


O
P
E
N

close

Recent Article in National

Rajasthan coop official, family sentenced in graft case

The former deputy manager of Rajasthan Cooperative Dairy Federation, Surendra Sharma, and his entire family were sentenced to six year... »