Bench to watch CCTV footage of 26/11 attack

Material cited as crucial piece of evidence in the Kasab death sentence case

February 22, 2012 12:03 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 09:23 pm IST - New Delhi

B-185,  MUM-040220 -  FEBRUARY 4, 2009 -   Mumbai:  Fresh picture of Amir Ajmal Kasab, the lone surviving terrorist of 26/11 Mumbai terror attack.  PTI Photo

B-185, MUM-040220 - FEBRUARY 4, 2009 - Mumbai: Fresh picture of Amir Ajmal Kasab, the lone surviving terrorist of 26/11 Mumbai terror attack. PTI Photo

Justices Aftab Alam and C.K. Prasad of the Supreme Court will watch in the chamber the closed-circuit television (CCTV) footage of the 26/11 terrorist attack provided by the Maharashtra government as a crucial piece of evidence in the Kasab death sentence case.

The Bench will also hear the intercepted telephonic conversations between the executors and their Pakistani handlers prior and during the Mumbai attack.

It agreed to watch the footage and hear the conversations after senior counsel Gopal Subramaniam, appearing for Maharashtra submitted that the material was important evidence relating to conspiracy and to show that the strikes were premeditated and masterminded in Pakistan.

He traced the sequence of events from the time Kasab and his associates landed in Mumbai till the showdown in Taj. “From the diary and intercepts of telephonic conversation between the terrorists and their handlers, three things are clear — that the attack in Mumbai on November 26, 2008 was pre-meditated, involving 10 terrorists who were from Pakistan.”

He said while the attack was launched at Hotel Taj, the terrorists were interacting with their Pakistani handlers. Mr. Subramaniam explained to the judges with the help of maps how Kasab and his associates carried out their operations meticulously.

At one stage when he was explaining the role of one Kharak Singh, whose name figured in the satellite telephonic intercepts, Justice Aftab Alam asked “who is he.” Mr. Subramaniam revealed interesting details of Kharak Singh, saying he was a fictitious name. “The Maharastra ATS feels he is from Karachi and one of the conspirators who talked to other terrorists planning the Mumbai attack. To mask his identity Kharak Singh bought 5 DID numbers-Direct Inward Calling Numbers from a New Jersey Company-Callphonex [voice over internet protocol] owned by Nazir, a Jordanian. This Callphonex operated in a shack in New Jersey,” counsel said “These 5 DID numbers were purchased from Voxpole, an Austrian company. Kharak Singh used to call from the DID numbers to Callphonex, which routed his calls to other numbers so that Kharak Singh's identity was not revealed. Kharak Singh used two email IDs, one in Yahoo and another in Hotmail to chat and email with Nazir. Kharak Singh's mail id was contacted by 5 people from Pakistan and Russia. The FBI found out that payments were made to Callphonex from Karachi.”

Mr. Subramaniam said: “Kharak Singh used Callphonex till November 24, 2008 and thereafter his account expired and his email ids terminated in January 2009.” When Justice Alam asked, “Can't you find out who Kharak Singh is,” counsel said: “Kharak Singh is a fictitious name. I don't want to say more on this now because there are still 36 accused wanted to be apprehended in this terror attack.”

Mr. Subramaniam also read out a few transcripts of taped conversations between the terrorists and Pakistani handlers. The transcripts showed the handlers asking the terrorists at Taj to put out the fire on the curtains and doors so that rescue could be delayed. The victims were termed “Rumali.”

The transcripts also showed that there was three-way calls; terrorists talking to others in Mumbai and to the Pakistani handlers and between themselves. Arguments will continue on Thursday.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.