Bar GM food crops, says parliamentary panel

‘Probe how Bt brinjal seed was allowed to be commercialised’

August 10, 2012 01:22 am | Updated September 30, 2016 08:37 pm IST - NEW DELHI

CAPTION : FOR DAILY : TIRUNELVELI : JANUARY : 30/01/2010 : Members of wemans federation raising slogans against the move to interduce Btbrinjal at Palayamkottai on Saturday. Photo: A_Shaikmohideen - CAPTION : FOR DAILY : TIRUNELVELI : JANUARY : 30/01/2010 : Members of wemans federation raising slogans against the move to interduce Btbrinjal at Palayamkottai on Saturday. Photo: A_Shaikmohideen

CAPTION : FOR DAILY : TIRUNELVELI : JANUARY : 30/01/2010 : Members of wemans federation raising slogans against the move to interduce Btbrinjal at Palayamkottai on Saturday. Photo: A_Shaikmohideen - CAPTION : FOR DAILY : TIRUNELVELI : JANUARY : 30/01/2010 : Members of wemans federation raising slogans against the move to interduce Btbrinjal at Palayamkottai on Saturday. Photo: A_Shaikmohideen

In a major setback to the proponents of genetically modified technology in farm crops, the Parliamentary Committee on Agriculture on Thursday asked the government to stop all field trials and sought a bar on GM food crops (such as Bt. brinjal).

The committee report, tabled in the Lok Sabha, demanded a “thorough probe” into how permission was given to commercialise Bt. brinjal seed when all evaluation tests were not carried out.

It said there were indications of a “collusion of the worst kind from the beginning till the imposition of a moratorium on its commercialisation in February, 2010, by the then Minister for Environment and Forests.”

The report came a day after Maharashtra cancelled Mahyco’s licence to sell its Bt. cotton seeds.

It flayed the government for not discussing the issue in Parliament and observed that the Ministry failed in its responsibility by introducing such a policy, ignoring the interests of the 70 per cent small and marginal farmers.

The report criticised the composition and regulatory role of the Genetic Engineering Approval (Appraisal) Committee and the Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation (RCGM).

According to Committee chairman Basudeb Acharia, there is not a single note of dissent in the report of the 31-member panel, including nine from the Congress and six from the BJP. Observing that GM crops (such as Bt. cotton) benefited the (seed) industry without a “trickle-down” gain to farmers, it recommended that till all concerns were addressed, further research and development should be done only in contained conditions.

Citing instances of conflict of interest of various stakeholders, the panel said the government must put in place all regulatory, monitoring, oversight and surveillance systems.

Raising the “ethical dimensions” of transgenics in agricultural crops, as well as studies of a long-term environmental and chronic toxicology impact, the panel noted that there were no significant socio-economic benefits to farmers. On the contrary, farmers have incurred huge debts because of this capital-intensive practice.

“Today, 93 per cent of the area is under Bt. cotton because no alternative seeds are available,” Mr. Acharia said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.